Analytical evaluation of a rapid on-site oral fluid drug test

被引:32
作者
Goessaert, An-Sofie [2 ]
Pil, Kristof [2 ]
Veramme, Jolien [2 ]
Verstraete, Alain [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Lab Clin Biol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Clin Chem Microbiol & Immunol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Saliva; Point-of-care test; Varian Oralab (R) 6; Sensitivity; DRIVERS; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1007/s00216-010-3463-8
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
There is a need for a reliable rapid on-site oral fluid test that can be used in police controls to detect impaired drivers. We evaluated the Varian OralabA (R) 6 and collected two oral fluid samples from 250 subjects, one with the Varian OralabA (R) 6 and one with the StatSure (TM) SalivaaEuro cent Sampler (TM). The OralabA (R) 6 can detect six drug types: amphetamines, methamphetamine, cocaine, opiates, delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), and phencyclidine (PCP). On-site results were obtained within 10 to 15 min. The sample collected with StatSure (TM) was analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry after liquid-liquid extraction and these results were used as a reference to determine prevalence, sensitivity, and specificity. Two cut-off values were used in the evaluation. The Varian cut-off values were: amphetamine 50 ng/mL, cocaine 20 ng/mL, opiates 40 ng/mL, and THC 50 ng/mL. The DRUID cut-offs were: amphetamine 25 ng/mL, cocaine 20 ng/mL, opiates 20 ng/mL, and THC 1 ng/mL. Applying the first cut-offs, prevalence, sensitivity, and specificity were: amphetamine 10%, 76%, 100%; cocaine 23%, 34%, 100%; opiates 38%, 83%, 94%; and THC 18%, 41%, 99%. The DRUID cut-off values gave the following results: amphetamine 14%, 56%, 100%; cocaine 28%, 34%, 100%; opiates 49%, 68%, 98%, and THC 45%, 16%, 99%. The specificity of the OralabA (R) 6 is generally good. For both cut-offs, sensitivity was low for cocaine and THC. Therefore, the Varian OralabA (R) 6 test is not sensitive enough to be applied during roadside police controls.
引用
收藏
页码:2461 / 2468
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Review: The physiology of saliva and transfer of drugs into saliva [J].
Aps, JKM ;
Martens, LC .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 150 (2-3) :119-131
[2]   Oral fluid as a diagnostic tool [J].
Choo, RE ;
Huestis, MA .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2004, 42 (11) :1273-1287
[3]   Legal issues in oral fluid testing [J].
Kadehjian, L .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 150 (2-3) :151-160
[4]   Correlation of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations determined by LC-MS-MS in oral fluid and plasma from impaired drivers and evaluation of the on-site Drager DrugTest® [J].
Laloup, Marleen ;
Fernandez, Maria del Mar Ramirez ;
Wood, Michelle ;
De Boeck, Gert ;
Maes, Viviane ;
Samyn, Nele .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 161 (2-3) :175-179
[5]   Drug testing in oral fluid - Evaluation of sample collection devices [J].
Langel, Kaarina ;
Engblom, Charlotta ;
Pehrsson, Anna ;
Gunnar, Teemu ;
Ariniemi, Kari ;
Lillsunde, Pirjo .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2008, 32 (06) :393-401
[6]   Roadside oral fluid testing:: Comparison of the results of Drugwipe 5 and Drugwipe Benzodiazepines on-site tests with laboratory confirmation results of oral fluid and whole blood [J].
Pehrsson, Anna ;
Gunnar, Teemu ;
Engblom, Charlotta ;
Seppa, Heikki ;
Jama, Ahlam ;
Lillsunde, Pirjo .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 175 (2-3) :140-148
[7]  
Pil K., 2009, Forensic Sci. Int, V1, P29
[8]   Usefulness of roadside urine drug screening in drivers suspected of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) [J].
Raes, E ;
Verstraete, AG .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2005, 29 (07) :632-636
[9]  
Verstraete A., 2006, Rosita-2 project: Final Report
[10]   Guidelines for research on drugged driving [J].
Walsh, J. Michael ;
Verstraete, Alain G. ;
Huestis, Marilyn A. ;
Morland, Jorg .
ADDICTION, 2008, 103 (08) :1258-1268