On the equivalence of Nash and evolutionary equilibrium in finite populations

被引:16
作者
Hehenkamp, Burkhard [1 ]
Possajennikov, Alex [2 ]
Guse, Tobias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dortmund, Dept Econ & Social Sci, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Econ, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
Nash equilibrium; Evolutionary stability; Finite populations; STABILITY; PRICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2009.08.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper provides sufficient and partially necessary conditions for the equivalence of symmetric Nash and evolutionary equilibrium in symmetric games played by finite populations. The conditions are based on generalized constant-sum and "smallness" properties, the latter of which is known from models of perfect competition and large games The conditions are illustrated on examples including oligopoly games (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 258
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   The asset market game [J].
Alós-Ferrer, C ;
Ania, AB .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 41 (1-2) :67-90
[2]   The evolutionary stability of perfectly competitive behavior [J].
Alós-Ferrer, C ;
Ania, AB .
ECONOMIC THEORY, 2005, 26 (03) :497-516
[3]   Evolutionary stability and Nash equilibrium in finite populations, with an application to price competition [J].
Ania, Ana B. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2008, 65 (3-4) :472-488
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EUR J POLIT ECON, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.EJP0LEC0.2003.09.002), DOI 10.1016/J.EJPOLECO.2003.09.002]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Evolution, Games, and Economic Behaviour
[6]  
Friedman J.W., 1990, GAME THEORY APPL EC
[8]   ARE PROFIT-MAXIMIZERS THE BEST SURVIVORS - A DARWINIAN MODEL OF ECONOMIC NATURAL-SELECTION [J].
SCHAFFER, ME .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1989, 12 (01) :29-45
[9]   LOGIC OF ANIMAL CONFLICT [J].
SMITH, JM ;
PRICE, GR .
NATURE, 1973, 246 (5427) :15-18
[10]   Stochastically stable states in an oligopoly with differentiated goods: equivalence of price and quantity strategies [J].
Tanaka, Y .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 34 (02) :235-253