Comparison of the Conventional Dresden Protocol and Accelerated Protocol With Higher Ultraviolet Intensity in Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus

被引:47
|
作者
Choi, Moonjung [1 ]
Kim, Jiwon [1 ]
Kim, Eung Kweon [1 ,2 ]
Seo, Kyoung Yul [1 ]
Kim, Tae-im [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Inst Vis Res, Dept Ophthalmol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Cornea Dystrophy Res Inst, Dept Ophthalmol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
corneal cross-linking; keratoconus; riboflavin; ultraviolet radiation; PROGRESSIVE KERATOCONUS; A LIGHT; RIBOFLAVIN; OUTCOMES; IRRADIATION; STANDARD;
D O I
10.1097/ICO.0000000000001165
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the accelerated corneal cross-linking (CXL) protocol and the conventional Dresden protocol in patients with keratoconus in terms of visual acuity, keratometric values, and topographic parameters. Methods: Twenty-eight eyes of 25 patients with primary keratoconus were divided into 2 groups; 15 eyes in group 1 received CXL under the standard Dresden protocol (3 mW/cm(2) for 30 min, dose 5.4 J/cm(2)) and 13 eyes in group 2 were treated with the accelerated protocol (30 mW/cm(2) for 3 min 40 s, dose 6.6 J/cm(2)). Visual acuity, refractive error, keratometry values obtained by both Pentacam and Auto Kerato-Refractometer, corneal thickness, and topometric indexes were compared 6 months postoperatively. Results: The visual acuity improved significantly from 0.17 +/- 0.16 to 0.08 +/- 0.09 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution in group 1 (P = 0.009). The cylindrical refractive error improved in both groups (P = 0.05 in group 1 and P = 0.011 in group 2), and the spherical equivalent increased in group 1 (P = 0.021). In group 1, the maximum keratometry value decreased by 0.55 +/- 0.89 diopters (P = 0.03), and the mean keratometry value decreased by 0.44 +/- 0.63 diopters (P = 0.017), whereas the changes in visual acuity, spherical and spherical equivalent refractive errors, and keratometric values in group 2 were not statistically significant. The corneal thickness at the apex decreased significantly in group 1 (P = 0.001), but the change was not significant in group 2. Conclusions: Despite a higher UV dose (6.6 J/cm2), accelerated CXL with higher UV intensity and reduced irradiation time showed a smaller topographic flattening effect than did the conventional Dresden protocol in primary keratoconus with documented progression.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 529
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of accelerated and conventional corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus
    Cinar, Yasin
    Cingu, Abdullah Kursat
    Turkcu, Fatih Mehmet
    Cinar, Tuba
    Yuksel, Harun
    Ozkurt, Zeynep Gursel
    Caca, Ihsan
    CUTANEOUS AND OCULAR TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 33 (03) : 218 - 222
  • [2] Accelerated, Pulsed Collagen Cross-Linking versus the Dresden Protocol in Keratoconus: A Case Series
    Dervenis, Nikolaos
    Dervenis, Panagiotis
    Dragoumis, Nikolaos
    Papandroudis, Andreas
    Zachariadis, Zachos
    Balidis, Miltos
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2020, 29 (04) : 332 - 337
  • [3] Conventional versus accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in the treatment of keratoconus
    Ng, Alex Lap Ki
    Chan, Tommy C. Y.
    Cheng, Arthur C. K.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 44 (01): : 8 - 14
  • [4] High-Intensity (Accelerated) Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus
    Kymionis, George D.
    Grentzelos, Michael A.
    CORNEA, 2015, 34 (01) : E1 - E1
  • [5] Corneal collagen cross-linking in patients with keratoconus from the Dresden protocol to customized solutions: theoretical basis
    Caruso, Ciro
    D'Andrea, Luca
    Troisi, Mario
    Rinaldi, Michele
    Piscopo, Raffaele
    Troisi, Salvatore
    Costagliola, Ciro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 17 (05) : 951 - 962
  • [6] Comparison of pain after subepithelial versus conventional accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus
    Shaowei Li
    Huatao Xie
    Man Xu
    Meiyan Li
    Chang Liu
    Jingliang He
    Tian Han
    Xingtao Zhou
    International Ophthalmology, 2019, 39 : 1249 - 1254
  • [7] Comparison of pain after subepithelial versus conventional accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus
    Li, Shaowei
    Xie, Huatao
    Xu, Man
    Li, Meiyan
    Liu, Chang
    He, Jingliang
    Han, Tian
    Zhou, Xingtao
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 39 (06) : 1249 - 1254
  • [8] Comparison of Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-linking Types for Treating Keratoconus
    Yildirim, Yusuf
    Olcucu, Onur
    Gunaydin, Zehra Karaagac
    Agca, Alper
    Ozgurhan, Engin Bilge
    Alagoz, Cengiz
    Mutaf, Cagri
    Demirok, Ahmet
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2017, 42 (07) : 971 - 975
  • [9] Accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus
    Cinar, Yasin
    Cingu, Abdullah Kursat
    Turkcu, Fatih Mehmet
    Yuksel, Harun
    Sahin, Alparslan
    Yildirim, Adnan
    Caca, Ihsan
    Cinar, Tuba
    CUTANEOUS AND OCULAR TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 33 (02) : 168 - 171
  • [10] Conventional Versus Accelerated Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus
    Konstantopoulos, Aris
    Mehta, Jodhbir S.
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 41 (02): : 65 - 71