Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in healthy subjects

被引:81
作者
Dahlstrom, N. [2 ]
Persson, A.
Albiin, N.
Smedby, O.
Brismar, T. B.
机构
[1] Hudiksvall Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hudiksvall, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ Hosp, Ctr Med Image Sci & Visualizat, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ Hosp, Div Radiol, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci Intervent & Technol, Div Radiol, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
bile ducts; biliary; comparative studies; intravenous contrast agents; liver; MR imaging;
D O I
10.1080/02841850701196922
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the biliary enhancement dynamics of the two gadolinium chelates Gd-BOPTA ( MultiHance (R)) and Gd-EOB-DTPA ( Primovist (R)) in normal healthy subjects. Material and Methods: Ten healthy volunteers were evaluated with both agents by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 1.5T using a breath-hold gradient-echo T1-weighted VIBE sequence. The relative signal intensity ( SI) differences between the common hepatic duct (CHD) and liver parenchyma were measured before and 10, 20, 30, 40, 130, 240, and 300 min after contrast medium injection. Results: Biliary enhancement was obvious 10 min post-injection for Gd- EOB-DTPA and was noted at 20 min for Gd- BOPTA. At 40 min delay, Gd- BOPTA reached its peak biliary enhancement, but at neither 30 nor 40 min delay was there any significant difference compared with that of Gd- EOB-DTPA. At later delays, the contrast between CHD and liver continued to increase for Gd- EOB-DTPA, whereas it decreased for Gd-BOPTA. Conclusion: The earlier onset and longer duration of a high contrast between CHD and liver for Gd- EOB-DTPA facilitates examination of hepatobiliary excretion. Therefore, Gd- EOB-DTPA may provide adequate hepatobiliary imaging within a shorter time span than Gd- BOPTA and facilitate scheduling at the MR unit. Further studies in patients are required to compare the imaging advantages of Gd- EOB-DTPA and Gd- BOPTA in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 368
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[21]   Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP [J].
Vandervoort, J ;
Soetikno, RM ;
Tham, TCK ;
Wong, RCK ;
Ferrari, AP ;
Montes, H ;
Roston, AD ;
Slivka, A ;
Lichtenstein, DR ;
Ruymann, FW ;
Van Dam, J ;
Hughes, M ;
Carr-Locke, DL .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (05) :652-656
[22]   A prospective comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary tract disease [J].
Varghese, JC ;
Farrell, MA ;
Courtney, G ;
Osborne, H ;
Murray, FE ;
Lee, MJ .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 54 (08) :513-520
[23]   B-19036, A POTENTIAL NEW HEPATOBILIARY CONTRAST AGENT FOR MR PROTON IMAGING [J].
VITTADINI, G ;
FELDER, E ;
TIRONE, P ;
LORUSSO, V .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1988, 23 :S246-S248
[24]   DILATED BILIARY-TRACT - EVALUATION WITH MR CHOLANGIOGRAPHY WITH A T2-WEIGHTED CONTRAST-ENHANCED FAST SEQUENCE [J].
WALLNER, BK ;
SCHUMACHER, KA ;
WEIDENMAIER, W ;
FRIEDRICH, JM .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (03) :805-808
[25]   A NEW LIPOPHILIC GADOLINIUM CHELATE AS A TISSUE-SPECIFIC CONTRAST-MEDIUM FOR MRI [J].
WEINMANN, HJ ;
SCHUHMANNGIAMPIERI, G ;
SCHMITTWILLICH, H ;
VOGLER, H ;
FRENZEL, T ;
GRIES, H .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1991, 22 (02) :233-237
[26]  
Weinmann HJ, 1991, MAGN RESON MED, V22, P242
[27]   MR versus multislice CT cholangiography in evaluating patients with obstruction of the biliary tract [J].
Zandrino, F ;
Curone, P ;
Benzi, L ;
Ferretti, ML ;
Musante, F .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2005, 30 (01) :77-85