Q-switched YAG laser vs. punch biopsy excision for iatrogenic radiation tattoo markers - a randomized controlled trial

被引:13
作者
Bregnhoj, A. [1 ]
Haedersdal, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
adverse effects; breast cancer; RCT; tattoo; treatment outcome; REMOVAL; AMATEUR;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03617.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background Ink markers are tattooed as landmarks before radiotherapy of breast cancer with the purpose of obtaining a precise radiation field. The black tattoo spots may cause potential psychological distress for the affected women. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects in a side-by-side comparison of Q-switched (Q-sw) YAG laser vs. punch biopsy excision of iatrogenic radiation tattoo markers. Methods Ten female volunteers with black tattoo markers after previous radiotherapy for breast cancer were included. Subjects received one punch biopsy excision and a series of three treatments at 6-week intervals with Q-sw YAG laser (Q-YAG 5 system, 1064 nm, Palomar Inc., Burlington, VT, USA); the interventions was randomly assigned to two closely located tattoos (n = 20). Treatment measures were evaluated 12 weeks after final treatment and included clinical efficacy, patient satisfaction, preferred treatment and adverse effects. A blinded observer evaluated the efficacy and adverse effects from photographs. Results Ten patients completed the study. Blinded photographic evaluations showed an overall excellent clearance (75-100% reduction in tattoo appearance) from both excision and laser treatments (P = 0.317). Patients were equally satisfied with Q-sw YAG laser treatment [median 9 (5.75-10, 25-75 percentiles)] and excision therapy [median 10 (5.75-10)] (P = 0.672). However, the majority of the patients preferred YAG laser (n = 8) to excision (n = 2) (P = 0.022) because adverse effects in terms of hypopigmentation (0/10 vs. 8/10 patients) and scarring (1/10 vs. 8/10 patients) occurred more frequently and appeared more pronounced in excision biopsy (hypopigmentation P = 0.014, scarring P = 0.021). Conclusion Q-sw YAG laser and punch biopsy excision are effective to clear iatrogenic radiation tattoo markers, but patients preferred the laser treatment because of less pronounced adverse effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1183 / 1186
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Q-SWITCHED ALEXANDRITE LASER TREATMENT (755 NM) OF PROFESSIONAL AND AMATEUR TATTOOS [J].
ALSTER, TS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1995, 33 (01) :69-73
[2]   Laser treatment of tattoos [J].
Bernstein, EF .
CLINICS IN DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 24 (01) :43-55
[3]  
Bukhari Iqbal A, 2005, J Cosmet Dermatol, V4, P107, DOI 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2005.40211.x
[4]   Tattoo removal [J].
Burris, Katy ;
Kim, Karen .
CLINICS IN DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 25 (04) :388-392
[5]  
Dierickx CC, 2005, LASER DERMATOLOGY, P37, DOI 10.1007/3-540-27205-4_3
[6]   Evaluation of the Nd/YAG laser for treatment of amateur and professional tattoos [J].
Ferguson, JE ;
August, PJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1996, 135 (04) :586-591
[7]  
Haedersdal M, 1996, ARCH DERMATOL, V132, P818
[8]   THE Q-SWITCHED ND-YAG LASER EFFECTIVELY TREATS TATTOOS - A CONTROLLED, DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY [J].
KILMER, SL ;
LEE, MS ;
GREVELINK, JM ;
FLOTTE, TJ ;
ANDERSON, RR .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1993, 129 (08) :971-978
[9]  
KILMER SL, 2007, CUTANEOUS LASER SURG, P213
[10]   Laser removal of tattoos [J].
Kuperman-Beade M. ;
Levine V.J. ;
Ashinoff R. .
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, 2001, 2 (1) :21-25