Pair bonds during the annual cycle of a long-distance migrant, the Arctic Tern (Sterna paradisaea)

被引:5
作者
Redfern, Chris P. F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Nat & Environm Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Great North Museum Hancock, Nat Hist Soc Northumbria, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4PT, Tyne & Wear, England
来源
AVIAN RESEARCH | 2021年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
Arctic Tern; Migration; Pair-bond; Partner association; RECONSTRUCTING ANIMAL PATHS; POSTFLEDGING PARENTAL CARE; COMMON TERNS; DIVORCE; MOVEMENTS; MIGRATION; ARRIVAL; BIRDS; MATES;
D O I
10.1186/s40657-021-00268-3
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe extent to which pairs remain together during the annual cycle is a key question in the behavioural ecology of migratory birds. While a few species migrate and winter as family units, for most the extent to which breeding partners associate in the non-breeding season is unknown. The Arctic Tern (Sterna paradisaea) has one of the longest migrations of any species, and the aim of this study was to establish whether or not partners remain together after breeding.MethodsLeg-mounted geolocators were fitted to breeding pairs of Arctic Terns nesting on the Farne Islands, Northumberland, UK. The devices were recovered for analysis the following year.ResultsAnalysis of data for the six pairs which returned the following year showed that partners departed from the colony at different times after breeding and migrated independently to different Antarctic regions. Partners also departed from the Antarctic and turned to the breeding colony independently. One third of the pairs divorced on return.ConclusionsFor long-distance migrants reliant on unpredictable foraging opportunities, it may not be viable to remain as pairs away from the breeding colony. Synchrony in arrival times at the breeding colony may maximise the chance of retaining a familiar partner, but could be affected by environmental factors in wintering areas or along migration routes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Family-based territoriality vs flocking in wintering common cranes Grus grus [J].
Alonso, JC ;
Bautista, LM ;
Alonso, JA .
JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY, 2004, 35 (05) :434-444
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, BIOL MARINE BIRDS, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781420036305.CH9
[3]   PROLONGED PARENTAL CARE IN ROYAL TERNS AND OTHER BIRDS [J].
ASHMOLE, NP ;
TOVAR, SH .
AUK, 1968, 85 (01) :90-&
[4]  
Barlow Maida, 1998, Notornis, V45, P193
[5]   Common Terns on the East Atlantic Flyway: temporal-spatial distribution during the non-breeding period [J].
Becker, Peter H. ;
Schmaljohann, Heiko ;
Riechert, Juliane ;
Wagenknecht, Goetz ;
Zajkova, Zuzana ;
Gonzalez-Solis, Jacob .
JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2016, 157 (04) :927-940
[6]   Fitness consequences of long-term pair bonds in barnacle geese: monogamy in the extreme [J].
Black, JM .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2001, 12 (05) :640-645
[7]  
Bried J, 1999, AUK, V116, P504
[8]   Mate fidelity in monogamous birds: a re-examination of the Procellariiformes [J].
Bried, J ;
Pontier, D ;
Jouventin, P .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2003, 65 :235-246
[9]  
Busse K., 1983, Oekologie der Voegel, V5, P73
[10]  
Cabot D., 2013, Terns