Least squares staggered-grid finite-difference for elastic wave modelling

被引:32
作者
Yang, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Hongyong [1 ]
Liu, Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geol & Geophys, Key Lab Petr Resources Res, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
dispersion; elastic wave; least squares; numerical modelling; staggered-grid finite-difference (SFD); REVERSE-TIME MIGRATION; HETEROGENEOUS MEDIA; SCHEMES; PROPAGATION; EQUATION; SIMULATIONS; OPERATOR;
D O I
10.1071/EG13087
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Staggered-grid finite-difference (SFD) methods have been used widely in seismic wave numerical modelling and migration. The conventional way to calculate the high-order SFD coefficients on spatial derivatives is the Taylor-series expansion method, which generally leads to great accuracy on just a small frequency zone. In this paper, we first derive the SFD coefficients of arbitrary even-order accuracy for the first-order spatial derivatives by the dispersion relation and the least-squares method, which can satisfy the specific numerical solution accuracy of the derivative on a wide frequency zone. Then we use the SFD coefficients based on the least-squares to solve the first-order spatial derivatives and analyse the accuracy of the numerical solution. Finally, we perform elastic wave numerical modelling with the least-squares staggered-grid finite-difference (LSSFD) method. Meanwhile, the numerical dispersion, the modelling accuracy and the computing costs of the new method are compared with that of the Taylor-series expansion staggered-grid finite-difference (TESFD) method. The numerical dispersion analysis and elastic wavefield modelling results demonstrate that the LSSFD method can efficiently suppress the numerical dispersion and has greater modelling accuracy than the conventional TESFD method under the same discretisations and without extra computing costs.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 260
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   A PERFECTLY MATCHED LAYER FOR THE ABSORPTION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC-WAVES [J].
BERENGER, JP .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1994, 114 (02) :185-200
[2]  
Chu CL, 2012, GEOPHYSICS, V77, pW17, DOI [10.1190/geo2011-0336.1, 10.1190/GEO2011-0336.1]
[3]  
Chu CL, 2012, GEOPHYSICS, V77, pT57, DOI [10.1190/GEO2011-0180.1, 10.1190/geo2011-0180.1]
[4]  
Dong LG, 2000, CHINESE J GEOPHYS-CH, V43, P411
[5]  
DONG LG, 2000, CHINESE J GEOPHYS, V43, P856
[6]  
Etgen JT., 2007, Stanford Exploration Project Report, V129, P33
[7]  
Graves RW, 1996, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V86, P1091
[8]   COMPUTATIONAL ASPECTS OF THE CHOICE OF OPERATOR AND SAMPLING INTERVAL FOR NUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION IN LARGE-SCALE SIMULATION OF WAVE PHENOMENA [J].
HOLBERG, O .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 1987, 35 (06) :629-655
[9]  
Hong-Yong Y., 2012, CHINESE J GEOPHYS, V55, P252
[10]  
Igel H., 1992, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, P1244