Estimation of the Endometriosis Fertility Index prior to operative laparoscopy

被引:12
作者
Tomassetti, C. [1 ,2 ]
Bafort, C. [1 ,2 ]
Vanhie, A. [1 ,2 ]
Meuleman, C. [1 ,2 ]
Fieuws, S. [3 ]
Welkenhuysen, M. [1 ]
Timmerman, D. [1 ,2 ]
Van Schoubroeck, D. [1 ]
D'Hooghe, T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Leuven Univ Fertil Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Dev & Regenerat, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Publ Hlth, Interuniv Ctr Biostat & Stat Bioinformat, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
endometriosis; classification; infertility; ultrasound; laparoscopy; pre-surgical triage tool; REPRODUCTIVE-PERFORMANCE; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; CLASSIFICATION; PREGNANCY; SURGERY; WOMEN; EFI;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/deaa346
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
STUDY QUESTION: Can the Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI) be estimated accurately before surgery? SUMMARY ANSWER: The EFI can be estimated accurately based on mere clinical/ultrasound information, with some improvement after adding data from diagnostic laparoscopy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The EFI is a validated clinical instrument predicting the probability of pregnancy after endometriosis surgery without the use of ART. Being an end-of-surgery-score, it implies the decision for operative laparoscopy to be made in advance-hence, its role in the pre-surgical decision-making process remains to be established. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Single-cohort prospective observational study in 82 patients undergoing complete endometriosis excision (between June and December 2016). Two methods were used to estimate the final EFI: type A based on non-surgical clinical/ultrasound findings only, and type B based on the combination of non-surgical clinical/ultrasound findings and diagnostic laparoscopy data. To calculate EFI type A, an algorithm was created to translate non-surgical clinical/imaging information into rASRM (revised American Society of Reproductive Medicine)-and EFI points. EFI type A and type B estimates were assessed for their clinical and numerical agreement with the final EFI score. Agreement was defined as clinical if EFI scores were within the same range (0-4, 5-6, 7-10), and numerical if their difference was <= I. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All 82 patients underwent complete laparoscopic CO2-laser excision of any rASRM stage of endometriosis in the Leuven University Fertility Centre (LUFC) of University Hospitals Leuven, a tertiary referral centre for both endometriosis and infertility. An anonymized clinical research file was created. For each patient, three different data sets were created, in order to allow the estimation of the (surgical part) EFI and of the rASRM scores, defined as follows: 'Estimated type A' contained only non-surgical clinical/imaging data, 'Estimated type B' included type A information plus the information of the diagnostic laparoscopy and 'Final EFI' included information of type A, type B and all intra-operative information required to calculate the final EFI. To calculate EFI type A without surgical information, a set of rules was used to translate pre-surgical clinical/imaging information into (rASRM and EFI points). Scoring was done by one person (CT.), with a time interval of 4 weeks between sessions for each EFI type. Next to the EFI, also rASRM score and stage were calculated. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Agreement rate between estimated EFI type A and final EFI was high for both the clinical (0.915; 95% CI 0.832-0.965) and numerical definition (0.878; 95% CI 0.787-0.940). Agreement rates between estimated EFI type B and final EFI were even higher (clinical (0.988; 95% CI 0.934-1.000), numerical (0.963; 95% CI 0.897-0.992)). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Type A estimation is dependent on high-level gynaecological ultrasound expertise, which may not be available in all clinics. A small number of patients had no prior clinical, ultrasound (hard markers) or surgical confirmation of the diagnosis of endometriosis. When applying the estimated EFI type A in clinical practice, a priori assumptions of the presence or absence of endometriosis will need to be made in adjunct to the estimation of the estimated type A EFI when counselling patients on the potential benefit of an (at least diagnostic) laparoscopy. The level of agreement for type A or B should also be taken into account when counselling patients on the type of efforts undertaken to attempt to diagnose or rule out endometriosis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: As this study reports, the EFI can be estimated accurately based on clinical/ultrasound data only without the need for any surgical data. This means that the EFI could be used as an instrument to guide joint physician-patient decision-making between surgery, ART or other fertility management options for the individualized treatment of women with endometriosis-related infertility.
引用
收藏
页码:636 / 646
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI) is simple to use
    Boujenah, J.
    Poncelet, C.
    Madelenat, P.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2016, 44 (05): : 259 - 262
  • [22] Negative Sliding Sign during Dynamic Ultrasonography Predicts Low Endometriosis Fertility Index at Laparoscopy
    Alfaraj, Sukainah
    Noga, Heather
    Allaire, Catherine
    Williams, Christina
    Lisonkova, Sarka
    Yong, Paul J.
    Bedaiwy, Mohamed A.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (02) : 249 - +
  • [23] Endometriosis Fertility Index for predicting non-assisted reproductive technology pregnancy after endometriosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vesali, S.
    Razavi, M.
    Rezaeinejad, M.
    Maleki-Hajiagha, A.
    Maroufizadeh, S.
    Sepidarkish, M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 127 (07) : 800 - 809
  • [24] Laparoscopy in endometriosis
    Rechkemmer-Prieto, Adolfo
    REVISTA PERUANA DE GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2009, 55 (01): : 17 - 20
  • [25] Surgical management of endometriosis to optimize fertility
    Hamilton, Kacey M.
    VanHise, Katherine
    Truong, Mireille D.
    Wright, Kelly N.
    Siedhoff, Matthew T.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 35 (04) : 389 - 394
  • [26] Can we accurately diagnose endometriosis without a diagnostic laparoscopy?
    Nezhat, Camran
    Agarwal, Shruti
    Lee, Deborah Ann
    Tavallaee, Mahkam
    JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 23 (02) : 117 - 119
  • [27] Reproductive Performance after Surgery for Endometriosis: Predictive Value of the Revised American Fertility Society Classification and the Endometriosis Fertility Index
    Zeng, Cheng
    Xu, Jia-ning
    Zhou, Yan
    Zhou, Ying-fang
    Zhu, Sai-nan
    Xue, Qing
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2014, 77 (03) : 180 - 185
  • [28] Endometriosis Fertility Index for Predicting Pregnancy after Endometriosis Surgery
    Li Xin
    Zeng Cheng
    Zhou Ying-Fang
    Yang Hui-Xia
    Shang Jing
    Zhu Sai-Nan
    Xue Qing
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2017, 130 (16) : 1932 - 1937
  • [29] Endometriosis Fertility Index: is it better than the present staging systems?
    Adamson, G. David
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 25 (03) : 186 - 192
  • [30] Fallopian tube endometriosis in women undergoing operative video laparoscopy and its clinical implications
    McGuinness, Bailey
    Nezhat, Farr
    Ursillo, Lauren
    Akerman, Meredith
    Vintzileos, William
    White, Michael
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (05) : 1040 - 1048