Simulation of highly nonlinear materials based on a stabilized non-ordinary state-based peridynamic model

被引:5
作者
Wang, Lei [1 ]
Huang, Surong [2 ]
Gu, Quan [3 ]
Sun, Baoyin [4 ]
Li, Shaofan [5 ]
Lin, Zhe [3 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Univ, Coll Architecture & Civil Engn, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Sch Aerosp Engn, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[3] Xiamen Univ, Sch Architecture & Civil Engn, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[4] Hohai Univ, Coll Civil & Transportat Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Peridynamics; Multi-yield surface plasticity model; Cap plasticity model; Zero-energy mode;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107250
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Peridynamics (PD) is an effective method to solve discontinuity problems that involve cracking or crushing behaviors. In the non-ordinary state-based PD (NOSBPD), the so called zero-energy mode may cause inaccuracy particularly when the material is highly nonlinear. This paper proposed a novel stabilized NOSBPD modeling method to mitigate the inaccuracy and instability of NOSBPD solutions. A correction force for a PD point is defined as the difference between an internal force obtained by stress equilibrium equation and that obtained by the force states of the points within its horizon. The correction force is applied on the PD points to be corrected, e. g., that on the boundary of a PD model. Three examples are presented demonstrating the proposed method's effectiveness in static and dynamic analyses of both linear or highly nonlinear models, i.e., 3D cap plasticity concrete model and 2D multi-yield surface soil model. The predicted responses (e.g., displacements, stresses, strains at representative points) are analyzed and compared with those without force correction for both linear and highly nonlinear cases. The proposed method is demonstrated to be an effective method for mitigating the inaccuracy and instability of the NOSBPD solutions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Nonlinear numerical simulation of physical shaking table test, using three different soil constitutive models [J].
Alisawi, A. T. ;
Collins, P. E. F. ;
Cashell, K. A. .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 143
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1976, J GEOTECH ENG DIV
[3]  
Askari A., 2015, Numer. Model. Fail. Adv. Compos. Mater., P331
[4]  
DiMaggio F.L., 1971, J ENG MECH DIV-ASCE, V97, P935, DOI 10.1061/JMCEA3.0001427
[5]   Peridynamic wetness approach for moisture concentration analysis in electronic packages [J].
Diyaroglu, C. ;
Oterkus, S. ;
Oterkus, E. ;
Madenci, E. ;
Han, S. ;
Hwang, Y. .
MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2017, 70 :103-111
[6]   Modeling of cyclic mobility in saturated cohesionless soils [J].
Elgamal, A ;
Yang, ZH ;
Parra, E ;
Ragheb, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY, 2003, 19 (06) :883-905
[7]   Consistent tangent moduli for multi-yield-surface J2 plasticity model [J].
Gu, Q. ;
Conte, J. P. ;
Yang, Z. ;
Elgamal, A. .
COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2011, 48 (01) :97-120
[8]  
Hill R., 1998, MATH THEORY PLASTICI
[9]   A MODIFIED CAP MODEL - CLOSEST POINT SOLUTION ALGORITHMS [J].
HOFSTETTER, G ;
SIMO, JC ;
TAYLOR, RL .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1993, 46 (02) :203-214
[10]   Nonlocal Peridynamic Modeling and Simulation on Crack Propagation in Concrete Structures [J].
Huang, Dan ;
Lu, Guangda ;
Liu, Yiming .
MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2015, 2015