Hybrid systems using residual modeling for sea surface temperature forecasting

被引:30
作者
de Mattos Neto, Paulo S. G. [1 ]
Cavalcanti, George D. C. [1 ]
Santos, Domingos S. de O. [1 ]
Silva, Eraylson G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Ctr Informat, Recife, PE, Brazil
关键词
SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; NEURAL-NETWORK; ARIMA;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-021-04238-z
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The sea surface temperature (SST) is an environmental indicator closely related to climate, weather, and atmospheric events worldwide. Its forecasting is essential for supporting the decision of governments and environmental organizations. Literature has shown that single machine learning (ML) models are generally more accurate than traditional statistical models for SST time series modeling. However, the parameters tuning of these ML models is a challenging task, mainly when complex phenomena, such as SST forecasting, are addressed. Issues related to misspecification, overfitting, or underfitting of the ML models can lead to underperforming forecasts. This work proposes using hybrid systems (HS) that combine (ML) models using residual forecasting as an alternative to enhance the performance of SST forecasting. In this context, two types of combinations are evaluated using two ML models: support vector regression (SVR) and long short-term memory (LSTM). The experimental evaluation was performed on three datasets from different regions of the Atlantic Ocean using three well-known measures: mean square error (MSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and mean absolute error (MAE). The best HS based on SVR improved the MSE value for each analyzed series by 82.26%, 98.93%, and 65.03% compared to its respective single model. The HS employing the LSTM improved 92.15%, 98.69%, and 32.41% concerning the single LSTM model. Compared to literature approaches, at least one version of HS attained higher accuracy than statistical and ML models in all study cases. In particular, the nonlinear combination of the ML models obtained the best performance among the proposed HS versions.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 69 条
[21]   A hybrid neural network and ARIMA model for water quality time series prediction [J].
Faruk, Durdu Oemer .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2010, 23 (04) :586-594
[22]   Error modeling approach to improve time series forecasters [J].
Firmino, Paulo Renato A. ;
de Mattos Neto, Paulo S. G. ;
Ferreira, Tiago A. E. .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 2015, 153 :242-254
[23]   Prediction of sea surface temperatures in the western Mediterranean Sea by neural networks using satellite observations [J].
Garcia-Gorriz, Elisa ;
Garcia-Sanchez, Joan .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2007, 34 (11)
[24]   TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS - FORECASTING AND CONTROL - BOX,GEP AND JENKINS,GM [J].
GEURTS, M .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (02) :269-269
[25]   A novel neural network ensemble architecture for time series forecasting [J].
Gheyas, Iffat A. ;
Smith, Leslie S. .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 2011, 74 (18) :3855-3864
[26]   Applications of soft computing models for predicting sea surface temperature: a comprehensive review and assessment [J].
Haghbin, Masoud ;
Sharafati, Ahmad ;
Motta, Davide ;
Al-Ansari, Nadhir ;
Noghani, Mohamadreza Hosseinian Moghadam .
PROGRESS IN EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE, 2021, 8 (01)
[27]  
Hochreiter S, 1997, NEURAL COMPUT, V9, P1735, DOI [10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735, 10.1162/neco.1997.9.1.1, 10.1007/978-3-642-24797-2]
[28]  
Hyndman R. J., 2021, Forecasting: principles and practice, V3rd
[29]   Automatic time series forecasting: The forecast package for R [J].
Hyndman, Rob J. ;
Khandakar, Yeasmin .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2008, 27 (03) :1-22
[30]  
Justus D, 2018, IEEE INT CONF BIG DA, P3873, DOI 10.1109/BigData.2018.8622396