Target concentration of propofol required to insert the laryngeal mask airway in children

被引:21
作者
Viviand, X [1 ]
Berdugo, L [1 ]
De La Noé, CA [1 ]
Lando, A [1 ]
Martin, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Nord Marseille, Dept Anaesthesia, F-13915 Marseille 20, France
来源
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA | 2003年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
propofol; target-controlled infusion system; anaesthesia; laryngeal mask airway;
D O I
10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.01006.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this prospective study was to determine the target concentration (C-PRED) curves for laryngeal mask airway (LMA(TM)) insertion in children. Methods: The C-PRED of propofol required for insertion of the LMA was determined in 72 unpremedicated children, aged 3-10 years, ASA physical status I. C-PRED was reached in 2 min according to a sequential allocation. LMA insertion was then performed by an experienced anaesthetist who was unaware of the concentration. Insertion conditions were noted as satisfactory (jaw relaxed, no coughing, gagging, swallowing or laryngeal spasm, minimal limb movement), excellent (no movement at all) or unacceptable if otherwise. Results: The C-PRED50 and C-PRED90 were 7.86 mug.ml(-l) [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.46-9.26] and 10.71 mug.ml(-l) (95% CI 9.31-12.12), respectively, in the satisfactory group and 10.86 mug.ml(-l) (95% CI 10.14-11.57) and 13.71 mug.ml(-l) (95% CI 12.99-14.42) in the excellent group when calculations were based on Kataria's pharmacokinetics. These figures were increased 1.5-fold when calculations were based on Marsh's pharmacokinetics. With Schuttler's pharmacokinetics, C-PRED50 were 4.62 mug.ml(-l) and 13.66 mug.ml(-l) for satisfactory and excellent groups, respectively. Conclusions: The target-controlled infusion technique for anaesthesia induction and insertion of the LMA was a safe and effective technique in our study.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 222
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   DOSE OF PROPOFOL REQUIRED TO INSERT THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY IN CHILDREN [J].
ALLSOP, E ;
INNES, P ;
JACKSON, M ;
CUNLIFFE, M .
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 5 (01) :47-51
[2]   Scaling for size: some implications for paediatric anaesthesia dosing [J].
Anderson, BJ ;
Meakin, GH .
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 12 (03) :205-219
[3]   The laryngeal mask airway: Limitations and controversies [J].
Brimacombe, JR ;
Berry, AM ;
White, PF .
INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS, 1998, 36 (02) :155-182
[4]   IV ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL USING A TARGET-CONTROLLED INFUSION SYSTEM - COMPARISON WITH INHALATION ANESTHESIA FOR GENERAL SURGICAL-PROCEDURES IN CHILDREN [J].
DOYLE, E ;
MCFADZEAN, W ;
MORTON, NS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 70 (05) :542-545
[5]   THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF PROPOFOL IN CHILDREN USING 3 DIFFERENT DATA-ANALYSIS APPROACHES [J].
KATARIA, BK ;
VED, SA ;
NICODEMUS, HF ;
HOY, GR ;
LEA, D ;
DUBOIS, MY ;
MANDEMA, JW ;
SHAFER, SL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 80 (01) :104-122
[6]   What determines anesthetic induction dose? It's the front-end kinetics, doctor! [J].
Krejcie, TC ;
Avram, MJ .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 89 (03) :541-544
[7]   Laryngeal mask airway in pediatric practice - A prospective study of skill acquisition by anesthesia residents [J].
LopezGil, M ;
Brimacombe, J ;
Cebrian, J ;
Arranz, J .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 84 (04) :807-811
[8]   Cerebral effects of propofol following bolus administration in sheep [J].
Ludbrook, GL ;
Upton, RN ;
Grant, C ;
Gray, EC .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1996, 24 (01) :26-31
[9]   PHARMACOKINETIC MODEL DRIVEN INFUSION OF PROPOFOL IN CHILDREN [J].
MARSH, B ;
WHITE, M ;
MORTON, N ;
KENNY, GNC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 67 (01) :41-48
[10]   Dose of propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in children: Effect of premedication with midazolam [J].
Martlew, RA ;
Meakin, G ;
Wadsworth, R ;
Sharples, A ;
Baker, RD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 76 (02) :308-309