GROUP AND DYADIC COMMUNICATION IN TRUST GAMES

被引：6

作者：

Lev-On, Azi ^{[1
]}

Chavez, Alex ^{[2
]}

Bicchieri, Cristina ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Ariel Univ Ctr, Sch Commun, IL-40700 Ariel, Israel

[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA

[3] Univ Penn, Dept Philosophy, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA

来源：

RATIONALITY AND SOCIETY | 2010年 / 22卷 / 01期

关键词：

communication; computer-mediated cooperation; communication laboratory experiments; trust;

D O I：

10.1177/1043463109337100

中图分类号：

C91 [社会学];

学科分类号：

030301 ; 1204 ;

摘要：

We study the behavioral consequences of interpersonal communication prior to experimental Trust games. We manipulated the richness of the communication medium and the size of the communicating group. Communication richness failed to produce significant differences in first-mover investments, but the size of the communicating group did: The amounts sent were significantly higher in the dyadic communication conditions than in the group communication and no-communication conditions. We also found that first-movers' expectations of secondmovers' reciprocation strongly predicted their levels of investment.

引用

页码：37 / 54

页数：18

共 19 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2007, Politics, Philos Econ, DOI DOI 10.1177/1470594X07077267

[2]

BENNER A, 2006, WORKING PAPERS BROWN

[3]

Bicchieri C., 2006, The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms, DOI DOI 10.1017/CB09780511616037

[4]

BICCHIERI C, 2009, SYNTHESE IN PRESS

[5] Communication and punishment in voluntary contribution experiments [J].

Bochet, O ;

Page, T ;

Putterman, L .

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2006, 60 (01) :11-26

[6]

Bos N., 2001, CHI: extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, P291, DOI DOI 10.1145/634067.634240

[7]

Brosig J., 2003, GER ECON REV, V4, P217, DOI [DOI 10.1111/1468-0475.00080, 10.1111/1468-0475.00080]

[8]

Dawes R.M., 1990, SELF INTEREST, P97

[9] GROUP-SIZE AND ONE-SHOT COLLECTIVE ACTION [J].

FRANZEN, A .

RATIONALITY AND SOCIETY, 1995, 7 (02) :183-200

[10]

FRANZEN A, 1994, SOCIAL DILEMMAS COOP, P117

← 1 2 →