Bond strengths of various resin cements to different ceramics

被引:5
作者
Sandes Farias, David Cardoso [1 ]
Goncalves, Leticia Machado [2 ]
Walter, Ricardo [3 ]
Chung, Yunro [4 ]
Blatz, Markus Bernhard [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ CEUMA, Dept Dent, Sao Luis, Maranhao, Brazil
[2] Univ CEUMA, Postgrad Program Dent, Sao Luis, Maranhao, Brazil
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Operat Dent, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[4] Arizona State Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, Tempe, AZ USA
[5] Univ Penn, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prevent & Restorat Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Resin Cements; Ceramics; Aging; Aluminum Oxide; Shear Strength;
D O I
10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0095
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the shear bond strength (SBS) of various resin cements to different ceramics. Composite resin cylinders of Z100 were fabricated and cemented to disks of feldspathic ceramic (Creation), leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic (Empress I), and densely sintered aluminum oxide ceramic (Procera AllCeram) using five resin cements: Panavia F (PAN), RelyX ARC (ARC), RelyX Unicem (RXU), RelyX Veneer, and Variolink II. SBS was measured after three days of water storage (baseline) and after artificial aging (180 days of water storage along with 12,000 thermal cycles). Failure mode of fractured specimens also was evaluated. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (alpha=0.05). RXU showed 1) the lowest baseline median SBS to feldspathic ceramic, which was not statistically different from PAN; 2) the lowest median baseline SBS to leucite-reinforced feldspathic and densely sintered aluminum-oxide ceramics. All cements performed similarly after aging, except for ARC (median 0.0 MPa) and PAN (median 16.2 MPa) in the densely sintered aluminum-oxide ceramic group. Resin cements perform differently when bonded to different ceramic substrates. While all test resin cements worked similarly in the long-term to feldspathic and leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramics, only the MDP-containing resin cement provided durable bonds to densely sintered aluminum-oxide ceramic.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic:: The effect of surface conditioning [J].
Amaral, R ;
Özcan, M ;
Bottino, MA ;
Valandro, LF .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2006, 22 (03) :283-290
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, BRAZ ORAL RES, V33, pE095
[3]   Bond strength of three luting agents to zirconia ceramic - influence of surface treatment and thermocycling [J].
Attia, Ahmed .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2011, 19 (04) :388-395
[4]   Shear bond strength of a resin cement to densely sintered high-purity alumina with various surface conditions [J].
Awliya, W ;
Oden, A ;
Yaman, P ;
Dennison, JB ;
Razzoog, ME .
ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 56 (01) :9-13
[5]   Evaluation of a New Universal Primer for Ceramics and Alloys [J].
Azimian, Farhad ;
Klosa, Karsten ;
Kern, Matthias .
JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2012, 14 (03) :275-282
[6]  
Barghi Nasser, 2006, J Esthet Restor Dent, V18, P47
[7]  
Blatz Markus B, 2003, J Esthet Restor Dent, V15, P362
[8]  
Blatz MB, 2004, AM J DENT, V17, P169
[9]   In vitro evaluation of long-term bonding of Procera AllCeram alumina restorations with a modified resin luting agent [J].
Blatz, MB ;
Sadan, A ;
Arch, GH ;
Lang, BR .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 89 (04) :381-387
[10]   Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature [J].
Blatz, MB ;
Sadan, A ;
Kern, M .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 89 (03) :268-274