Efficiency and risk in Japanese banking

被引:240
作者
Altunbas, Y
Liu, MH
Molyneux, P [1 ]
Seth, R
机构
[1] Univ Wales, Sch Accounting Banking & Econ, Bangor LL57 2DG, Gwynedd, Wales
[2] S Bank Univ, Sch Business, London SE1 0AA, England
[3] Fed Reserve Bank New York, New York, NY 10045 USA
[4] Nanyang Technol Univ, Nanyang Business Sch, Singapore 639798, Singapore
关键词
Japanese banks; cost functions; economies of scale; inefficiencies; technical change;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00095-3
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the impact of risk and quality factors on banks' cost by using the stochastic cost frontier methodology to evaluate scale and X-inefficiencies, as well as technical change for a sample of Japanese commercial banks between 1993 and 1996, Loan-loss provisions are included in the cost frontier model to control for output quality, with a financial capital and a liquidity ratio included to control risk. Following the approach suggested in Mester (1996) we show that if risk and quality factors are not taken into account optimal bank size tends to be overstated. That is, optimal bank size is considerably smaller when risk and quality factors are taken into account when modelling the cost characteristics of Japanese banks. We also find that the level of financial capital has the biggest influence on the scale efficiency estimates. X-inefficiency estimates, in contrast, appear less sensitive to risk and quality factors. Our results also suggest that scale inefficiencies dominate X-inefficiencies. These are important findings because they contrast with the results of previous studies on Japanese banking. In particular, the results indicate an alternative policy prescription, namely, that the largest banks should shrink to benefit from scale advantages. It also seems that financial capital has the largest influence on optimal bank size. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. JEL classification: G21; D21; G23.
引用
收藏
页码:1605 / 1628
页数:24
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Aigner D., 1977, Journal of Econometrics, V6, P21, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5, 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5]
[2]   Operational efficiency in banking: An international comparison [J].
Allen, L ;
Rai, N .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1996, 20 (04) :655-672
[3]  
ALTUNBAS Y, 1994, UNPUB SENSITIVITY ST
[4]  
Baltagi B.H., 2008, Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, V3rd ed.
[5]   A GENERAL INDEX OF TECHNICAL CHANGE [J].
BALTAGI, BH ;
GRIFFIN, JM .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1988, 96 (01) :20-41
[6]  
*BANK JAP, 1996, Q B 0803, P5
[7]  
*BANK JAP, 1995, Q B 1103, P27
[8]   RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE ECONOMETRIC ESTIMATION OF FRONTIERS [J].
BAUER, PW .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1990, 46 (1-2) :39-56
[9]   Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks [J].
Berger, AN ;
DeYoung, R .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1997, 21 (06) :849-870
[10]   Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research [J].
Berger, AN ;
Humphrey, DB .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 98 (02) :175-212