Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis

被引:63
作者
Zarei, Esmaeil [1 ]
Khan, Faisal [1 ]
Abbassi, Rouzbeh [2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Ctr Risk Integr & Safety Engn C RISE, St John, NF A1B 3X5, Canada
[2] Macquarie Univ, Fac Sci & Engn, Sch Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Human reliability analysis; Human error; Process industry; Emergency management; Control room; Maintenance operations; ERROR IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUES; PERFORMANCE SHAPING FACTORS; CONTROL ROOM OPERATORS; NUCLEAR-POWER-PLANTS; MAIN CONTROL ROOM; HIGH-RISK SYSTEMS; SITUATION AWARENESS; PART; MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES; EMERGENCY RESPONSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2021.107607
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Chemical process industries (CPIs) work with a variety of hazardous materials in quantities which have the potential to have large health, environmental and financial impacts and as such are exposed to the risk of major accidents. The experience with accidents in this domain shows many cases which involve complex human-machine interactions. Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) has been utilized as a proactive approach to identify, model, and quantify human error highlighted as the leading cause of accidents. Consequently, researchers have actively worked on enhancing process safety and risk engineering since the '70s. However, despite its importance and practical implications for improving human reliability, there has not been a review of human reliability related to processing systems. The present study is aimed at presenting a systematic attempt to identify the needs, gaps, and challenges of HRA in CPI. An in-depth analysis of the literature in Web of Science core collection and Scopus databases from 1975 to August 2020 is conducted. This analysis focuses on human factors in three critical elements of CPIs: maintenance operations, emergency operations, and control room operations. The analysis synthesizes the theoretical and empirical findings, shedding light on the strengths and shortcomings of current literature and identifying research opportunities. A comparison of HRA in CPIs is undertaken with nuclear power plants (NPPs) to better understand the current stage of research and research challenges and opportunities.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Review of Cognitive Models in Human Reliability Analysis
    Pan, Xing
    Lin, Ye
    He, Congjiao
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 33 (07) : 1299 - 1316
  • [22] Inclusion of task dependence in human reliability analysis
    Su, Xiaoyan
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    Xu, Peida
    Deng, Yong
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2014, 128 : 41 - 55
  • [23] Integrated design environment for human performance and human reliability analysis
    Nelson, WR
    GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES OF HUMAN FACTORS IN POWER GENERATION, 1997, : 87 - 811
  • [24] Dependency definitions for quantitative human reliability analysis
    Paglioni, Vincent P.
    Groth, Katrina M.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 220
  • [25] Human reliability and unsafe behavior factor analysis of chemicals loading process in a dock
    Kao, G-H
    Lu, C-W
    ERGONOMICS IN ASIA: DEVELOPMENT, OPPORTUNITIES, AND CHALLENGES, 2012, : 283 - 288
  • [26] Evidential Analytic Hierarchy Process Dependence Assessment Methodology in Human Reliability Analysis
    Chen, Luyuan
    Zhou, Xinyi
    Xiao, Fuyuan
    Deng, Yong
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 49 (01) : 123 - 133
  • [27] Human reliability analysis of intelligent mine human-computer interaction based on improved SPAR-H
    Yuan, Xiaofang
    Jiang, Xin
    Shi, Zepeng
    Sun, Linhui
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2024, 423
  • [28] Human reliability assessment (HRA) in maintenance of production process: a case study
    Aalipour M.
    Ayele Y.Z.
    Barabadi A.
    International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2016, 7 (2) : 229 - 238
  • [29] A data-informed PIF hierarchy for model-based Human Reliability Analysis
    Groth, Katrina M.
    Mosleh, Ali
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2012, 108 : 154 - 174
  • [30] An enhanced SHERPA (E-SHERPA) method for human reliability analysis in railway engineering
    Catelani, Marcantonio
    Ciani, Lorenzo
    Guidi, Giulia
    Patrizi, Gabriele
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 215