Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis

被引:69
作者
Zarei, Esmaeil [1 ]
Khan, Faisal [1 ]
Abbassi, Rouzbeh [2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Ctr Risk Integr & Safety Engn C RISE, St John, NF A1B 3X5, Canada
[2] Macquarie Univ, Fac Sci & Engn, Sch Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Human reliability analysis; Human error; Process industry; Emergency management; Control room; Maintenance operations; ERROR IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUES; PERFORMANCE SHAPING FACTORS; CONTROL ROOM OPERATORS; NUCLEAR-POWER-PLANTS; MAIN CONTROL ROOM; HIGH-RISK SYSTEMS; SITUATION AWARENESS; PART; MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES; EMERGENCY RESPONSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2021.107607
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Chemical process industries (CPIs) work with a variety of hazardous materials in quantities which have the potential to have large health, environmental and financial impacts and as such are exposed to the risk of major accidents. The experience with accidents in this domain shows many cases which involve complex human-machine interactions. Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) has been utilized as a proactive approach to identify, model, and quantify human error highlighted as the leading cause of accidents. Consequently, researchers have actively worked on enhancing process safety and risk engineering since the '70s. However, despite its importance and practical implications for improving human reliability, there has not been a review of human reliability related to processing systems. The present study is aimed at presenting a systematic attempt to identify the needs, gaps, and challenges of HRA in CPI. An in-depth analysis of the literature in Web of Science core collection and Scopus databases from 1975 to August 2020 is conducted. This analysis focuses on human factors in three critical elements of CPIs: maintenance operations, emergency operations, and control room operations. The analysis synthesizes the theoretical and empirical findings, shedding light on the strengths and shortcomings of current literature and identifying research opportunities. A comparison of HRA in CPIs is undertaken with nuclear power plants (NPPs) to better understand the current stage of research and research challenges and opportunities.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 142 条
[1]   An integrated method for human error probability assessment during the maintenance of offshore facilities [J].
Abbassi, Rouzbeh ;
Khan, Faisal ;
Garaniya, Vikram ;
Chai, Shuhong ;
Chin, Christopher ;
Hossain, Khandoker Abul .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2015, 94 :172-179
[2]   A human reliability analysis methodology for oil refineries and petrochemical plants operation: Phoenix-PRO qualitative framework [J].
Abilio Ramos, M. ;
Lopez Droguett, E. ;
Mosleh, A. ;
Das Chagas Moura, M. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 193
[3]   A data-based comparison of BN-HRA models in assessing human error probability: An offshore evacuation case study [J].
Abrishami, Shokoufeh ;
Khakzad, Nima ;
Hosseini, Seyed Mahmoud .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 202
[4]   A practical application of human reliability assessment for operating procedures of the emergency fire pump at ship [J].
Akyuz, Emre ;
Celik, Erkan ;
Celik, Metin .
SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES, 2018, 13 (02) :208-216
[5]   A phase of comprehensive research to determine marine-specific EPC values in human error assessment and reduction technique [J].
Akyuz, Emre ;
Celik, Metin ;
Cebi, Selcuk .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2016, 87 :63-75
[6]   A review of the cognitive basis for human reliability analysis [J].
Alvarenga, M. A. B. ;
Frutuoso e Melo, P. F. .
PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2019, 117
[7]   A bibliometric review of process safety and risk analysis [J].
Amin, Md Tanjin ;
Khan, Faisal ;
Amyotte, Paul .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2019, 126 :366-381
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2019, COGN TECHNOL WORK
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Safety differently: Human factors for a new era
[10]  
[Anonymous], CHEM ENG PROG