Machine learning-based dispatch of drone-delivered defibrillators for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

被引:26
作者
Chu, Jamal [1 ]
Leung, K. H. Benjamin [1 ]
Snobelen, Paul [2 ]
Nevils, Gordon [2 ]
Drennan, Ian R. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Cheskes, Sheldon [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Chan, Timothy C. Y. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, 5 Kings Coll Rd,Off MC315, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
[2] Peel Reg Paramed Serv, Brampton, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Med Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Sunnybrook Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Sunnybrook Ctr Prehosp Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Family & Community Med, Div Emergency Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Cardiac arrest; Drone; Automated external defibrillator; BYSTANDER DEFIBRILLATION; LOCATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.028
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Drone-delivered defibrillators have the potential to significantly reduce response time for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, optimal policies for the dispatch of such drones are not yet known. We sought to develop dispatch rules for a network of defibrillator-carrying drones. Methods: We identified all suspected OHCAs in Peel Region, Ontario, Canada from Jan. 2015 to Dec. 2019. We developed drone dispatch rules based on the difference between a predicted ambulance response time to a calculated drone response time for each OHCA. Ambulance response times were predicted using linear regression and neural network models, while drone response times were calculated using drone specifications from recent pilot studies and the literature. We evaluated the dispatch rules based on response time performance and dispatch decisions, comparing them to two baseline policies of never dispatching and always dispatching drones. Results: A total of 3573 suspected OHCAs were included in the study with median and mean historical ambulance response times of 5.8 and 6.2 min. All machine learning-based dispatch rules significantly reduced the median response time to 3.9 min and mean response time to 4.1-4.2 min (all P < 0.001) and were non-inferior to universally dispatching drones (all P < 0.001) while reducing the number of drone flights by up to 30%. Dispatch rules with more drone flights achieved higher sensitivity but lower specificity and accuracy. Conclusion: Machine learning-based dispatch rules for drone-delivered defibrillators can achieve similar response time reductions as universal drone dispatch while substantially reducing the number of trips.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 127
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] OSMnx: New methods for acquiring, constructing, analyzing, and visualizing complex street networks
    Boeing, Geoff
    [J]. COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2017, 65 : 126 - 139
  • [2] Optimizing a Drone Network to Deliver Automated External Defibrillators
    Boutilier, Justin J.
    Brooks, Steven C.
    Janmohamed, Alyf
    Byers, Adam
    Buick, Jason E.
    Zhan, Cathy
    Schoellig, Angela P.
    Cheskes, Sheldon
    Morrison, Laurie J.
    Chan, Timothy C. Y.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2017, 135 (25) : 2454 - +
  • [3] Improving Access to Automated External Defibrillators in Rural and Remote Settings: A Drone Delivery Feasibility Study
    Cheskes, Sheldon
    McLeod, Shelley L.
    Nolan, Michael
    Snobelen, Paul
    Vaillancourt, Christian
    Brooks, Steven C.
    Dainty, Katie N.
    Chan, Timothy C. Y.
    Drennan, Ian R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2020, 9 (14):
  • [4] Unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) in out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest
    Claesson, A.
    Fredman, D.
    Svensson, L.
    Ringh, M.
    Hollenberg, J.
    Nordberg, P.
    Rosenqvist, M.
    Djarv, T.
    Osterberg, S.
    Lennartsson, J.
    Ban, Y.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 24
  • [5] Time to Delivery of an Automated External Defibrillator Using a Drone for Simulated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests vs Emergency Medical Services
    Claesson, Andreas
    Backman, Anders
    Ringh, Mattias
    Svensson, Leif
    Nordberg, Per
    Djarv, Therese
    Hollenberg, Jacob
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 317 (22): : 2332 - 2334
  • [6] Underutilisation of public access defibrillation is related to retrieval distance and time-dependent availability
    Deakin, Charles D.
    Anfield, Steve
    Hodgetts, Gillian A.
    [J]. HEART, 2018, 104 (16) : 1339 - 1343
  • [7] Public access defibrillation remains out of reach for most victims of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest
    Deakin, Charles D.
    Shewry, Elizabeth
    Gray, Huon H.
    [J]. HEART, 2014, 100 (08) : 619 - 623
  • [8] Differences Between Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Residential and Public Locations and Implications for Public-Access Defibrillation
    Folke, Fredrik
    Gislason, Gunnar H.
    Lippert, Freddy K.
    Nielsen, Soren L.
    Weeke, Peter
    Hansen, Morten L.
    Fosbol, Emil L.
    Andersen, Soren S.
    Rasmussen, Soren
    Schramm, Tina K.
    Kober, Lars
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (06) : 623 - 630
  • [9] Bystander Defibrillation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Public vs Residential Locations
    Hansen, Steen Moller
    Hansen, Carolina Malta
    Folke, Fredrik
    Rajan, Shahzleen
    Kragholm, Kristian
    Ejlskov, Linda
    Gislason, Gunnar
    Kober, Lars
    Gerds, Thomas A.
    Hjortshoj, Soren
    Lippert, Freddy
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    Wissenberg, Mads
    [J]. JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 2 (05) : 507 - 514
  • [10] Automated external defibrillator accessibility is crucial for bystander defibrillation and survival: A registry-based study
    Karlsson, Lena
    Hansen, Carolina Malta
    Wissenberg, Mads
    Hansen, Steen Moller
    Lippert, Freddy K.
    Rajan, Shahzleen
    Kragholm, Kristian
    Moller, Sidsel G.
    Sondergaard, Kathrine Bach
    Gislason, Gunnar H.
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    Folke, Fredrik
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2019, 136 : 30 - 37