Experimental investigation of progressive collapse resistance of one-way reinforced concrete beam-slab substructures under a middle-column-removal scenario

被引:180
作者
Ren, Peiqi [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yi [1 ]
Lu, Xinzheng [2 ]
Guan, Hong [3 ]
Zhou, Yulong [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Beijing Collaborat Innovat Ctr Metropolitan Trans, Key Lab Urban Secur & Disaster Engn, Minist Educ, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Key Lab Civil Engn Safety & Durabil, Minist Educ, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Griffith Univ, Griffith Sch Engn, Gold Coast Campus, Brisbane, Qld 4222, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Reinforced concrete frame structure; One-way beam-slab substructure; Progressive collapse resistance; Middle column removal scenario; Experimental investigation; BEHAVIOR; SUBASSEMBLAGES; BUILDINGS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.051
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Floor systems composed of beams and slabs are critical structural elements of frame structures to resist progressive collapse. Previous experimental studies have focused mainly on beam-column or continuous-beam substructures and have ignored the influence of the slab. To study the progressive collapse-resisting mechanisms of reinforced concrete (RC) floor systems, seven 1/3-scaled one-way substructure specimens, including five beam-slab specimens and two continuous-beam specimens without slabs, were tested under a middle-column-removal scenario. The effects of various structural parameters, including sectional dimensions (beam height, slab width, and slab thickness) and seismic reinforcement, on the progressive collapse resistance were studied by analyzing material strains and load-displacement curves. Under small deformations, the progressive collapse resistance was largely affected by the beam height, slab width and seismic reinforcement in the beams. However, the effect of the slab width, upon exceeding the effective flange width, became insignificant. Note that increasing the slab thickness simultaneously increased the amount of slab reinforcement according to the minimum requirement of reinforcement ratio for slabs, such an increase will in turn enhanced the progressive collapse resistance. In addition, the existence of the slab led to an over-reinforced damage in the compressive zones of the beam ends, which accelerated the bending failure and the presence of the catenary action of the specimens. Under large deformations, the progressive collapse resistance was mainly influenced by the reinforcement area of the entire beam-slab section. The total reinforcement area of a beam-slab substructure designed to meet a higher seismic requirement was not significantly increased, and consequently, the progressive collapse resistance of the substructure under the catenary mechanism was not notably improved. This finding stands in stark contrast to those of previous tests of beam-column specimens without slabs. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 40
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] ABRAMS DP, 1987, ACI STRUCT J, V84, P502
  • [2] American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2010, MIN DES LOADS BUILD
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, ALTERNATE PATH ANAL
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, UN FAC CRIT UFC DES
  • [5] Membrane action of unrestrained lightly reinforced concrete slabs at large displacements
    Bailey, CG
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2001, 23 (05) : 470 - 483
  • [6] British Standard Institute, 1997, BS8110 1
  • [7] Progressive collapse fragility of reinforced concrete framed structures through incremental dynamic analysis
    Brunesi, E.
    Nascimbene, R.
    Parisi, F.
    Augenti, N.
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2015, 104 : 65 - 79
  • [8] European Committee for Standardisation, 2006, 199117 EN EUR COMM S
  • [9] Robustness evaluation of RC frame buildings to progressive collapse
    Fascetti, Alessandro
    Kunnath, Sashi K.
    Nistico, Nicola
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2015, 86 : 242 - 249
  • [10] Experimental behaviour of concrete floor slabs at large displacements
    Foster, SJ
    Bailey, CG
    Burgess, IW
    Plank, RJ
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2004, 26 (09) : 1231 - 1247