How to evaluate effects of occupational therapy - lessons learned from an exploratory randomized controlled trial

Background: Although occupational therapy (OT) is frequently prescribed in clinical practice, there is still insufficient evidence regarding its efficacy to improve Parkinson's Disease (PD)-related activity limitations. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of OT and the validity of different outcome-parameters to reflect efficacy, including gold-standard clinical rating scales and quantitative motor assessments. Methods: 40 patients were included in an exploratory, randomized-controlled, single-blinded trial, receiving either (I) ten weeks of OT, with a main focus on motor aspects of activity limitations and a ten-week follow-up assessment or (II) no intervention. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of PD and Hoehn & Yahr stage 2-3. Patients with major depression, other neurological or orthopedic diseases or OT beforehand were excluded from the study. To monitor treatment effects the MDS-UPDRS part II and III were used for patient- and clinician-based assessment. Objective Pegboard as well as Q-Motor "tremormotography" and "digitomotography" were applied. Results: The interventional group reported a subjective amelioration of activity limitations, with a significant improvement of MDS-UPDRS part II at the end of the study (p = 0.030). However, clinician's rating and quantitative motor assessment failed to detect a significant improvement of motor impairment and fine motor control. Conclusions: This study goes in line with previous trials, showing an individual improvement of activity limitations from the patients' point of view. The discrepancy between self-perception, focusing on activity limitation, and clinician-based rating, focusing on motor impairment, challenges the current gold standard assessments as valid outcome parameters for occupational therapy trials aiming for an individualized improvement of disease burden.