Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery

被引:163
作者
Jayaraman, Shiva [1 ]
Colquhoun, Patrick H. D. [1 ]
Malthaner, Richard A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Surg, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s10350-007-0308-4
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the long-term results of stapled hemorrhoidopexy with conventional excisional hemorrhoidectomy in patients with internal hemorrhoids. METHODS: A systematic review of all randomized, controlled trials comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and conventional hemorrhoidectomy with long-term results was performed by using the Cochrane methodology. The minimum follow-up) was six months. Primary outcomes were hemorrhoid recurrence, hemorrhoid symptom recurrence, complications, and pain. RESULTS: Twelve trials were included. Follow-up varied from six months to four years. Conventional hemorrhoidectomy was more effective in preventing long-term recurrence of hemorrhoids (odds ratio (OR), 3.85; 95 percent confidence interval (CI), 1.47-10.07; P<0.006). Conventional hemorrhoidectomy also prevents hemorrhoids in Studies with follow-up of one year or more (OR, 3.6; 95 percent CI, 1.24-10.49; P<0.02). Conventional hemorrhoidectomy is superior in preventing the symptom of prolapse (OR, 2.96; 9:5 percent CI, 1.33-6-58; P<0.008). Conventional hemorrhoidectomy also is more effective at preventing prolapse in studies with follow-up of one year or more (OR, 2.68; 95 percent CI, 0.98-7-34; P<0.05). Nonsignificant trends in favor of conventional hemorrhoidectomy, were seen in the proportion of asymptomatic patients, bleeding, soiling/difficulty with hygiene/incontinence, the presence of perianal skin tags, and the need for further surgery. Nonsignificant trends in favor of stapled hemorrhoidopexy, were seen in pain, pruritus ani, and symptoms of anal obstruction/stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional hemorrhoidectomy is superior to stapled hemorrhoidopexy for prevention of postoperative recurrence of internal hemorrhoids. Fewer patients who received conventional hemorrhoidectomy complained of hemorrhoidal prolapse in long-term follow-up compared with stapled hemorrhoidopexy. [Key words: Hemorrhoid; Hemorrhoidectomy; Hemorrhoidopexy; Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids; Staple; Prolapse]
引用
收藏
页码:1297 / 1305
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], COCHRANE REV HDB
  • [2] Closed vs. open hemorrhoidectomy -: Is there any difference?
    Arbman, G
    Krook, H
    Haapaniemi, S
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2000, 43 (01) : 31 - 34
  • [3] Au-Yong I, 2004, Colorectal Dis, V6, P37, DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00496.x
  • [4] Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse
    Boccasanta, P
    Capretti, PG
    Venturi, M
    Cioffi, U
    De Simone, M
    Salamina, G
    Contessini-Avesani, E
    Peracchia, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 182 (01) : 64 - 68
  • [5] Brown S R, 2001, Colorectal Dis, V3, P175, DOI 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2001.00224.x
  • [6] A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up
    Cheetham, MJ
    Cohen, CRG
    Kamm, AA
    Phillips, RKS
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (04) : 491 - 497
  • [7] Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy
    Cheetham, MJ
    Mortensen, NJM
    Nystrom, PO
    Kamm, MA
    Phillips, RKS
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 (9231) : 730 - 733
  • [8] Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy -: A randomized, clinical trial
    Correa-Rovelo, JM
    Tellez, O
    Obregón, L
    Miranda-Gomez, A
    Moran, S
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2002, 45 (10) : 1367 - 1374
  • [9] Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy
    Ganio, E
    Altomare, DF
    Gabrielli, F
    Milito, G
    Canuti, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (05) : 669 - 674
  • [10] GUERIN MO, 2005, DIS COLON RECTUM, V48, P1523