Nature-based solutions in the urban context: terminology, classification and scoring for urban challenges and ecosystem services

被引:126
作者
Castellar, J. A. C. [1 ,2 ]
Popartan, L. A. [3 ]
Pueyo-Ros, J. [1 ,2 ]
Atanasova, N. [4 ]
Langergraber, G. [5 ]
Saumel, I. [6 ]
Corominas, L. [1 ,2 ]
Comas, J. [1 ,3 ]
Acuna, V. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Catalan Inst Water Res ICRA, Carrer Emili Grahit 101, Girona 17003, Spain
[2] Univ Girona, Placa St Domenec 3, Girona 17003, Spain
[3] Univ Girona, Inst Environm, LEQUIA, Campus Montilivi,Carrer Aurelia Capmany, E-17003 Girona, Catalonia, Spain
[4] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Civil & Geodet Engn, Jamova 2, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[5] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Vienna BOKU, Inst Sanit Engn & Water Pollut Control, Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
[6] Humboldt Univ, Integrat Res Inst Transformat Human Environm Syst, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
NBS; Evaluation; Clustering; Nomenclature; Cities; Definition; GOVERNANCE; LESSONS; MANAGEMENT; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146237
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The concept of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) has emerged to foster sustainable development by transversally addressing social, economic, and environmental urban challenges. However, there is still a considerable lack of agreement on the conceptualization of NBS, especially concerning typologies, nomenclature, and performance assessments in terms of ecosystem services (ES) and urban challenges (UC). Therefore, this article consolidates the knowledge from 4 European projects to set a path for a common understanding of NBS and thus, facilitate their mainstreaming. To do so, firstly, we performed elicitation workshops to develop an integrative list of NBS, based on the identification of overlaps among NBS from different projects. The terminologies were formalized via web-based surveys. Secondly, the NBS were clustered, following a conceptual hierarchical classification. Thirdly, we developed an integrative assessment of NBS performance (ES and UC) based on the qualitative evaluations from each project. Afterwards, we run a PCA and calculated the evenness index to explore patterns among NBS. The main conceptual advancement resides in providing a list of 32 NBS and putting forward two novel NBS categories: NBS units (NBSu) that are stand-alone green technologies or green urban spaces, which can be combined with other solutions (nature-based or not); NBS interventions (NBSi) that refer to the act of intervening in existing ecosystems and in NBSu, by applying techniques to support natural processes. The statistical analysis suggests that NBSu are more versatile than NBSi in terms of UC and ES. Moreover, the results of the integrative assessment of NBS performance suggest a greater agreement concerning the role of NBS in addressing environmental UC, cultural and regulating ES than regarding socio-economic UC and supporting and provision ES. Finally, the 'green factor' and the replication of non-intensive practices occurring in nature seem to be key criteria for practitioners to identify a particular solution as an NBS. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Addressing societal challenges through nature-based solutions: How can landscape planning and governance research contribute? [J].
Albert, Christian ;
Schroeter, Barbara ;
Haase, Dagmar ;
Brillinger, Mario ;
Henze, Jennifer ;
Herrmann, Sylvia ;
Gottwald, Sarah ;
Guerrero, Paulina ;
Nicolas, Claire ;
Matzdorf, Bettina .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2019, 182 :12-21
[2]   Nexus between nature-based solutions, ecosystem services and urban challenges [J].
Almenar, Javier Babi ;
Elliot, Thomas ;
Rugani, Benedetto ;
Philippe, Bodenan ;
Gutierrez, Tomas Navarrete ;
Sonnemann, Guido ;
Geneletti, Davide .
LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 100
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities: final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on 'Nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities, DOI [10.2777/765301, DOI 10.2777/765301]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, IUCN Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions: a user-friendly framework for the verification, design and scaling up of NbS, DOI [10.2305/iucn.ch.2020.08.en, DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.08.EN, 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.09.en]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: A Framework for Assessment Report of the Conceptual Framework Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
[6]  
Berghofer Augustin., 2011, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity
[7]  
Bonoli A, 2018, ACTA HORTIC, V1215, P11, DOI [10.17660/actahortic.2018.1215.2, 10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1215.2]
[8]   Sustainability as Empty Signifier: Its Rise, Fall, and Radical Potential [J].
Brown, Trent .
ANTIPODE, 2016, 48 (01) :115-133
[9]  
Chang W., 2021, SHINY WEB APPL FRAME
[10]  
Cohen-Shacham E., 2016, IUCN INT UNION CONSE, V97, P2016, DOI [DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.EN, 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.en]