The Effect of Background Music on Inhibitory Functions: An ERP Study

被引:26
作者
Burkhard, Anja [1 ]
Elmer, Stefan [1 ]
Kara, Denis [1 ]
Brauchli, Christian [1 ]
Janckela, Lutz [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Psychol Inst, Dept Neuropsychol, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, URPP, Dynam Hlth Aging, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
EEG; Go/NoGo; event-related potentials; background music; arousal; inhibition; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; COGNITIVE CONTROL; TEST-PERFORMANCE; NO INFLUENCE; COMPONENTS; CONFLICT; DISTRACTION; PREFERENCE; ARTIFACTS; MISMATCH;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2018.00293
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The influence of background music on cognitive functions is still a matter of debate. In this study, we investigated the influence of background music on executive functions (particularly on inhibitory functions). Participants completed a standardized cued Go/NoGo task during three different conditions while an EEG was recorded (1: with no background music, 2: with relaxing, or 3: with exciting background music). In addition, we collected reaction times, omissions, and commissions in response to the Go and NoGo stimuli. From the EEG data, event-related potentials (ERPs) were calculated for the Go and NoGo trials. From these ERPs, the N2 and P3 components were specifically analyzed since previous studies have shown that these components (and particularly the Go-NoGo difference waves) are strongly associated with inhibitory functions. The N2 and P3 components of the difference waves (N2d and P3d) were used for statistical analyses. The statistical analyses revealed no differences between the three conditions in terms of amplitudes and latencies of the N2d and P3d components. In addition, reaction times, omissions, and commissions were comparable across all conditions. Our results suggest that in the context of this paradigm, music as background acoustic stimulation has no detrimental effects on the performance of a Go/NoGo task and neural underpinnings.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Cognitive control in children with learning disabilities: neuromarker for deficient executive functions [J].
Alahmadi, Nsreen A. .
NEUROREPORT, 2017, 28 (11) :638-644
[2]   A CLASSIFICATION OF HAND PREFERENCE BY ASSOCIATION ANALYSIS [J].
ANNETT, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 61 (03) :303-&
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, MUSIKPSYCHOLOGIE JB
[4]   Beware misleading cues: Perceptual similarity modulates the N2/P3 complex [J].
Azizian, A ;
Freitas, AL ;
Parvaz, MA ;
Squires, NK .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 43 (03) :253-260
[5]   MEASURING HANDEDNESS WITH QUESTIONNAIRES [J].
BRYDEN, MP .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1977, 15 (4-5) :617-624
[6]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[7]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]
[8]   EFFECTS OF VOCAL AND INSTRUMENTAL MUSIC ON VISUOSPATIAL AND VERBAL PERFORMANCE AS MODERATED BY STUDYING PREFERENCE AND PERSONALITY [J].
CRAWFORD, HJ ;
STRAPP, CM .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1994, 16 (02) :237-245
[9]   The distracting effects of music on the cognitive test performance of creative and non-creative individuals [J].
Doyle, Maddie ;
Furnham, Adrian .
THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2012, 7 (01) :1-7
[10]   Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined go/nogo and stop-signal task [J].
Enriquez-Geppert, Stefanie ;
Konrad, Carsten ;
Pantev, Christo ;
Huster, Rene J. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 51 (02) :877-887