The adoption of generic immunosuppressant medications in kidney, liver, and heart transplantation among recipients in Colorado or nationally with Medicare part D

被引:7
作者
Liu, Qian [1 ]
Smith, Abigail R. [1 ]
Park, Jeong M. [2 ]
Oguntimein, Murewa [3 ]
Dutcher, Sarah [3 ]
Bello, Ghalib [1 ,4 ]
Helmuth, Margaret [1 ]
Turenne, Marc [1 ]
Balkrishnan, Rajesh [5 ]
Fava, Melissa [1 ]
Beil, Charlotte A. [1 ]
Saulles, Adam [2 ]
Goel, Sangeeta [2 ]
Sharma, Pratima [6 ]
Leichtman, Alan [1 ]
Zee, Jarcy [1 ]
机构
[1] Arbor Res Collaborat Hlth, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Coll Pharm, 428 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] US FDA, Silver Spring, MD USA
[4] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] Univ Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
brand-name; generic; immunosuppressant; generic drug substitution; kidney transplantation; liver transplantation; hepatology; heart transplantation; organ transplantation in general; health services and outcomes research; TACROLIMUS; IMPACT; DRUGS; TRENDS; BRAND;
D O I
10.1111/ajt.14722
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The transplant community is divided regarding whether substitution with generic immunosuppressants is appropriate for organ transplant recipients. We estimated the rate of uptake over time of generic immunosuppressants using US Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Event (PDE) and Colorado pharmacy claims (including both Part D and non-Part D) data from 2008 to 2013. Data from 26070 kidney, 15548 liver, and 6685 heart recipients from Part D, and 1138 kidney and 389 liver recipients from Colorado were analyzed. The proportions of patients with PDEs or claims for generic and brand-name tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil were calculated over time by transplanted organ and drug. Among Part D kidney, liver, and heart beneficiaries, the proportion dispensed generic tacrolimus reached 50%-56% at 1year after first generic approval and 78%-81% by December 2013. The proportion dispensed generic mycophenolate mofetil reached 70%-73% at 1year after generic market entry and 88%-90% by December 2013. There was wide interstate variability in generic uptake, with faster uptake in Colorado compared with most other states. Overall, generic substitution for tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil for organ transplant recipients increased rapidly following first availability, and utilization of generic immunosuppressants exceeded that of brand-name products within a year of market entry. Analysis of prescription drug event and claims data from transplant recipients shows that overall rates of generic substitution for tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil increased rapidly following first availability and that utilization of generic immunosuppressants exceeded that of brand-name products within a year of market entry.
引用
收藏
页码:1764 / 1773
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Report of the American Society of Transplantation conference on immunosuppressive drugs and the use of generic immunosuppressants
    Alloway, RR
    Isaacs, R
    Lake, K
    Hoyer, P
    First, R
    Helderman, H
    Bunnapradist, S
    Leichtman, A
    Bennett, MW
    Tejani, A
    Takemoto, SK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 3 (10) : 1211 - 1215
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, EXPRESS SCRIPTS 2013
  • [3] Certner DM, LETT MEDICARE PROG B
  • [4] A single-centre comparison of the clinical outcomes at 6 months of renal transplant recipients administered Adoport (R) or Prograf (R) preparations of tacrolimus
    Connor, Andrew
    Prowse, Andrew
    Newell, Paul
    Rowe, Peter A.
    [J]. CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL, 2013, 6 (01): : 21 - 28
  • [5] Generic immunosuppression in transplantation: current evidence and controversial issues
    El Hajj, Sandra
    Kim, Miae
    Phillips, Karen
    Gabardi, Steven
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2015, 11 (05) : 659 - 672
  • [6] Generic Maintenance Immunosuppression in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
    Ensor, Christopher R.
    Trofe-Clark, Jennifer
    Gabardi, Steven
    McDevitt-Potter, Lisa M.
    Shullo, Michael A.
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2011, 31 (11): : 1111 - 1129
  • [7] The financial impact of immunosuppressant expenses on new kidney transplant recipients
    Gordon, Elisa J.
    Prohaska, Thomas R.
    Sehgal, Ashwini R.
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 22 (06) : 738 - 748
  • [8] Updated trends in US brand-name and generic drug competition
    Grabowski, Henry
    Long, Genia
    Mortimer, Richard
    Boyo, Ani
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 19 (09) : 836 - 844
  • [9] Generic Immunosuppression: Deciphering the Message Our Patients Are Receiving
    Hulbert, Amanda L.
    Pilch, Nicole A.
    Taber, David J.
    Chavin, Kenneth D.
    Baliga, Prabhakar K.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2012, 46 (05) : 671 - 677
  • [10] KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients: a summary
    Kasiske, Bertram L.
    Zeier, Martin G.
    Chapman, Jeremy R.
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Ekberg, Henrik
    Garvey, Catherine A.
    Green, Michael D.
    Jha, Vivekanand
    Josephson, Michelle A.
    Kiberd, Bryce A.
    Kreis, Henri A.
    McDonald, Ruth A.
    Newmann, John M.
    Obrador, Gregorio T.
    Vincenti, Flavio G.
    Cheung, Michael
    Earley, Amy
    Raman, Gowri
    Abariga, Samuel
    Wagner, Martin
    Balk, Ethan M.
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 77 (04) : 299 - 311