Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review

被引:26
|
作者
Gong, Yining [1 ]
Xu, Lingyi [2 ]
Zhuang, Hongqing [3 ]
Jiang, Liang [1 ]
Wei, Feng [1 ]
Liu, Zhongjun [1 ]
Li, Yan [1 ]
Yu, Miao [1 ]
Ni, Kaiwen [4 ]
Liu, Xiaoguang [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Orthoped, 49 North Garden Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Eight Year Program, Grade 2015, Hlth Sci Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Radiat Oncol, 49 North Garden Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Res Ctr Clin Epidemiol, Hosp 3, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2019年 / 8卷 / 14期
关键词
multi-fraction; single-fraction; spinal metastases; stereotactic body radiotherapy; stereotactic radiosurgery; systematic review; RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA; RADIATION-THERAPY; SINGLE-FRACTION; CORD COMPRESSION; LOCAL FAILURE; PAIN PALLIATION; FRACTURE RISK; RADIOSURGERY; OUTCOMES; SESSION;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.2546
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background In the treatment of spinal metastases, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers precise, high-dose radiation to the target region while sparing the spinal cord. A range of doses and fractions had been reported; however, the optimal prescribed scheme remains unclear. Methods Two reviewers performed independent literature searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and Web of Science databases. Articles were divided into one to five fractions groups. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the quality of studies. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were presented for the included studies and a pooled value was calculated by the weighted average. Results The 38 included studies comprised 3,754 patients with 4,731 lesions. The average 1-year LCs for the one to five fractions were 92.7%, 84.6%, 86.8%, 82.6%, and 80.6%, respectively. The average 1-year OS for the one to five fractions were 53.0%, 70.4%, 60.1%, 48%, and 80%, respectively. The 24 Gy/single fraction scheme had a higher 1-year LC (98.1%) than those of 24 Gy/two fractions (85.4%), 27 Gy/three fractions (84.9%), and 24 Gy/three fractions (89.0%). The incidence of vertebral compression fracture was 10.3%, with 10.7% in the single-fraction group and 10.1% in the multi-fraction group. The incidence of radiation-induced myelopathy was 0.19%; three and two patients were treated with single-fraction and multi-fraction SBRT, respectively. The incidence of radiculopathy was 0.30% and all but one patient were treated with multi-fraction SBRT. Conclusions SBRT provided satisfactory efficacy and acceptable safety for spinal metastases. Single-fraction SBRT demonstrated a higher local control rate than those of the other factions, especially the 24 Gy dose. The risk of vertebral compression fracture (VCF) was slightly higher in single-fraction SBRT and more patients developed radiculopathy after multi-fraction SBRT.
引用
收藏
页码:6176 / 6184
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Stratified by Target Delineation for Patients Undergoing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases
    Attiah, Mark
    Sandler, Kiri
    Medina, Rogelio
    Gaonkar, Bilwaj
    McArthur, David
    Farha, George
    Selch, Michael
    De Salles, Antonio
    Tenn, Stephen
    Agazaryan, Nzhde
    Lee, Percy
    Steinberg, Michael
    Lu, Daniel
    Macyszyn, Luke
    Kaprealian, Tania
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 136 : E68 - E74
  • [22] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases: a review of 24 Gy in 2 daily fractions
    Nguyen, Eric K.
    Ruschin, Mark
    Zhang, Beibei
    Soliman, Hany
    Myrehaug, Sten
    Detsky, Jay
    Chen, Hanbo
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Tseng, Chia-Lin
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2023, 163 (01) : 15 - 27
  • [23] Palliative stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal and non-spinal bone metastases: combining tradition and innovation
    Ito, Kei
    Nakamura, Naoki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025,
  • [24] Phase II Clinical Trial of Second Course of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases
    Ito, Kei
    Nakajima, Yujiro
    Taguchi, Kentaro
    Ogawa, Hiroaki
    Saito, Makoto
    Murofushi, Keiko Nemoto
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (12)
  • [25] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Spinal Metastases: Who Will Benefit the Most from SBRT?
    Park, Hae Jin
    Kim, Hee Jung
    Won, Jong-Ho
    Lee, Sang Chul
    Chang, Ah Ram
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2015, 14 (02) : 159 - 167
  • [26] Vertebral fractures following stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases
    Abbouchie, Hussein
    Chao, Michael
    Tacey, Mark
    Joon, Daryl Lim
    Ho, Huong
    Guerrieri, Mario
    Ng, Michael
    Foroudi, Farshad
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 64 (02) : 293 - 302
  • [27] d Evaluation of efficacy and safety of robotic stereotactic body radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for vertebral metastases
    Ksiezniak-Baran, Dorota
    Blamek, Slawomir
    Roch-Zniszczol, Agata
    Stapor-Fudzinska, Malgorzata
    Miszczyk, Leszek
    WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY, 2015, 19 (04): : 327 - 332
  • [28] Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for painful bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Ito, Kei
    Saito, Tetsuo
    Nakamura, Naoki
    Imano, Nobuki
    Hoskin, Peter
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [29] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for the treatment of spinal metastases
    Balagamwala, Ehsan H.
    Cherian, Sheen
    Angelov, Lilyana
    Suh, John H.
    Djemil, Toufik
    Lo, Simon S.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Chang, Eric
    Teh, Bin S.
    Chao, Samuel T.
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2012, 1 (03) : 255 - 265
  • [30] Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Management of Spinal Metastases A Review
    Glicksman, Rachel M.
    Tjong, Michael C.
    Neves-Junior, Wellington F. P.
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    Chua, Kevin L. M.
    Mansouri, Alireza
    Chua, Melvin L. K.
    Berlin, Alejandro
    Winter, Jeff D.
    Dahele, Max
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Bilsky, Mark
    Shultz, David B.
    Maldaun, Marcos
    Szerlip, Nicholas
    Lo, Simon S.
    Yamada, Yoshiya
    Vera-Badillo, Francisco Emilio
    Marta, Gustavo N.
    Moraes, Fabio Y.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (04) : 567 - 577