Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review

被引:26
|
作者
Gong, Yining [1 ]
Xu, Lingyi [2 ]
Zhuang, Hongqing [3 ]
Jiang, Liang [1 ]
Wei, Feng [1 ]
Liu, Zhongjun [1 ]
Li, Yan [1 ]
Yu, Miao [1 ]
Ni, Kaiwen [4 ]
Liu, Xiaoguang [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Orthoped, 49 North Garden Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Eight Year Program, Grade 2015, Hlth Sci Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Radiat Oncol, 49 North Garden Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Res Ctr Clin Epidemiol, Hosp 3, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2019年 / 8卷 / 14期
关键词
multi-fraction; single-fraction; spinal metastases; stereotactic body radiotherapy; stereotactic radiosurgery; systematic review; RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA; RADIATION-THERAPY; SINGLE-FRACTION; CORD COMPRESSION; LOCAL FAILURE; PAIN PALLIATION; FRACTURE RISK; RADIOSURGERY; OUTCOMES; SESSION;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.2546
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background In the treatment of spinal metastases, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers precise, high-dose radiation to the target region while sparing the spinal cord. A range of doses and fractions had been reported; however, the optimal prescribed scheme remains unclear. Methods Two reviewers performed independent literature searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and Web of Science databases. Articles were divided into one to five fractions groups. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the quality of studies. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were presented for the included studies and a pooled value was calculated by the weighted average. Results The 38 included studies comprised 3,754 patients with 4,731 lesions. The average 1-year LCs for the one to five fractions were 92.7%, 84.6%, 86.8%, 82.6%, and 80.6%, respectively. The average 1-year OS for the one to five fractions were 53.0%, 70.4%, 60.1%, 48%, and 80%, respectively. The 24 Gy/single fraction scheme had a higher 1-year LC (98.1%) than those of 24 Gy/two fractions (85.4%), 27 Gy/three fractions (84.9%), and 24 Gy/three fractions (89.0%). The incidence of vertebral compression fracture was 10.3%, with 10.7% in the single-fraction group and 10.1% in the multi-fraction group. The incidence of radiation-induced myelopathy was 0.19%; three and two patients were treated with single-fraction and multi-fraction SBRT, respectively. The incidence of radiculopathy was 0.30% and all but one patient were treated with multi-fraction SBRT. Conclusions SBRT provided satisfactory efficacy and acceptable safety for spinal metastases. Single-fraction SBRT demonstrated a higher local control rate than those of the other factions, especially the 24 Gy dose. The risk of vertebral compression fracture (VCF) was slightly higher in single-fraction SBRT and more patients developed radiculopathy after multi-fraction SBRT.
引用
收藏
页码:6176 / 6184
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for de novo spinal metastases: systematic review
    Husain, Zain A.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    De Salles, Antonio
    Funaro, Melissa
    Glover, Janis
    Hayashi, Motohiro
    Hiraoka, Masahiro
    Levivier, Marc
    Ma, Lijun
    Martinez-Alvarez, Roberto
    Paddick, J. Ian
    Regis, Jean
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Ryu, Samuel
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2017, 27 (03) : 295 - 302
  • [2] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: a review
    Guo, Lanlan
    Ke, Lixin
    Zeng, Ziyi
    Yuan, Chuanping
    Wu, Ziwei
    Chen, Lei
    Lu, Lixia
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 39 (05)
  • [3] The evolution and rise of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases
    Vellayappan, Balamurugan A.
    Chao, Samuel T.
    Foote, Matthew
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Redmond, Kristin J.
    Chang, Eric L.
    Mayr, Nina A.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Lo, Simon S.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2018, 18 (09) : 887 - 900
  • [4] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases: Practice Guidelines, Outcomes, and Risks
    Jabbari, Siavash
    Gerszten, Peter C.
    Ruschin, Mark
    Larson, David A.
    Lo, Simon S.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (04) : 280 - 289
  • [5] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal and Bone Metastases
    Bhattacharya, I. S.
    Hoskin, P. J.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 27 (05) : 298 - 306
  • [6] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: a review
    Lanlan Guo
    Lixin Ke
    Ziyi Zeng
    Chuanping Yuan
    Ziwei Wu
    Lei Chen
    Lixia Lu
    Medical Oncology, 39
  • [7] Systematic review of stereotactic body radiotherapy for nodal metastases
    Deodato, Francesco
    Macchia, Gabriella
    Buwenge, Milly
    Bonetti, Mattia
    Cilla, Savino
    Zamagni, Alice
    Re, Alessia
    Pezzulla, Donato
    Cellini, Francesco
    Strigari, Lidia
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Morganti, Alessio G.
    CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL METASTASIS, 2021, 38 (01) : 11 - 29
  • [8] STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY REIRRADIATION FOR RECURRENT EPIDURAL SPINAL METASTASES
    Mahadevan, Anand
    Floyd, Scotf
    Wong, Eric
    Jeyapalan, Suriya
    Groff, Michael
    Kasper, Ekkehard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (05): : 1500 - 1505
  • [9] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases: A systematic review
    Petrelli, Fausto
    Comito, Tiziana
    Barni, Sandro
    Pancera, Gianfranco
    Scorsetti, Marta
    Ghidini, Antonio
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 129 (03) : 427 - 434
  • [10] Technique for stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases
    Foote, Matthew
    Letourneau, Daniel
    Hyde, Derek
    Massicotte, Eric
    Rampersaud, Raja
    Fehlings, Michael
    Fisher, Charles
    Lewis, Stephen
    La Macchia, Nancy
    Yu, Eugene
    Laperriere, Normand J.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 18 (02) : 276 - 279