Political Analysis for Health Policy Implementation

被引:116
作者
Campos, Paola Abril [1 ]
Reich, Michael R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Int Hlth Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
implementation; health policy; politics of implementation; political analysis; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; THAILAND; LEADERSHIP; ECONOMY; REFORM; CHINA;
D O I
10.1080/23288604.2019.1625251
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Any effort to improve health system performance must address the challenges of policy implementation. This article examines one aspect of implementation-the politics of policy implementation for the health sector, particularly the management of stakeholders in order to help change teams improve the chances of achieving policy objectives. Based on a literature scan of political analyses and descriptions of health policy implementation in low- and middle-income countries, we propose six major categories of stakeholder groups that are likely to influence implementation: interest group politics, bureaucratic politics, budget politics, leadership politics, beneficiary politics, and external actor politics. The categories of stakeholders can be overlapping. We examine the politics of these different stakeholder categories, and then present selected examples of published case studies that show the types of implementation challenges that arise for each category and how implementers can use political strategies to manage specific stakeholder groups and related political processes. Understanding the political dimensions of implementation can help those responsible for implementation drive policy into practice more effectively. Understanding and addressing conflict, resistance and cooperation among stakeholders are key to managing the implementation process. Systematic and continuous political analysis can help decision makers and change teams improve the chances for successful implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 235
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Social Work and Implementation of the Affordable Care Act [J].
Andrews, Christina M. ;
Darnell, Julie S. ;
McBride, Timothy D. ;
Gehlert, Sarah .
HEALTH & SOCIAL WORK, 2013, 38 (02) :67-71
[2]  
[Anonymous], HLTH SYST REFORM
[3]  
Barber M., 2011, Deliverology, 101: A field guide for educational leaders
[4]  
Battilana J, 2013, HARVARD BUS REV, V91, P62
[5]   Global Fund investments in human resources for health: innovation and missed opportunities for health systems strengthening [J].
Bowser, Diana ;
Sparkes, Susan Powers ;
Mitchell, Andrew ;
Bossert, Thomas J. ;
Baernighausen, Till ;
Gedik, Gulin ;
Atun, Rifat .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2014, 29 (08) :986-997
[6]   Addressing vulnerability in an emerging economy: China's New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) [J].
Chen, Lin ;
de Haan, Arjan ;
Zhang, Xiulan ;
Warmerdam, Ward .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-REVUE CANADIENNE D ETUDES DU DEVELOPPEMENT, 2011, 32 (04) :399-413
[7]  
DUNSIRE A, 1978, EXECUTION PROCESS IM, V1
[8]   How to start thinking about investigating power in the organizational settings of policy implementation [J].
Erasmus, Ermin ;
Gilson, Lucy .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2008, 23 (05) :361-368
[9]   The Global Health System: Strengthening National Health Systems as the Next Step for Global Progress [J].
Frenk, Julio .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2010, 7 (01)
[10]   The terrain of health policy analysis in low and middle income countries: a review of published literature 1994-2007 [J].
Gilson, Lucy ;
Raphaely, Nika .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2008, 23 (05) :294-307