Experience with a training program for transgastric procedures in NOTES

被引:17
作者
Fuchs, Karl-Hermann [1 ]
Breithaupt, Wolfram [1 ]
Kuehl, Hans-Juergen [2 ]
Schulz, Thomas [1 ]
Dignass, Axel [2 ]
机构
[1] Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurter Diakonie Kliniken, Klin Viszeral Gefass & Thoraxchirurg, D-60431 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Markus Krankenhaus, Klin Gastroenterol Hepatol & Onkol, D-60431 Frankfurt, Germany
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2010年 / 24卷 / 03期
关键词
NOTES; Surgical training; Endoscopic training; Cholecystectomy; Cardiomyotomy; Bowel resection; Transgastric operations; TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-009-0587-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The transgastric approach to the abdominal cavity has been under experimental investigation in recent years as a method of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). In this study our team, consisting of surgeons and gastroenterologists, focused on training techniques with currently available instruments to perform transgastric procedures. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the learning process during the establishment of a training program for NOTES. Therefore several procedures were tested in terms of training issues such as the applicability of instruments and techniques for both gastroenterologists and surgeons. After initial testing of the basic steps, a defined training program was initialized in an animal facility of a medical company. Permission for animal training was applied for and granted by the local government. Ten training sessions were performed on a porcine model using animals with a median weight of 65 kg (40-85 kg). General anesthesia was performed in all cases. Transgastric tube resection (TTR), cholecystectomy (TCE), cardiomyotomy (TMY), and small bowel segmental resection (TSBR) were performed. The learning process was evaluated, including handling issues for flexible instruments, access, closure problems, and special technical issues. Procedure duration, as a marker of the learning curve effect, was evaluated. Intra-esophageal friction, lack of platform stability, lack of precision in tissue retraction, and lack of independence of endoscopic vision were the most difficult technical problems encountered. The operative time range was 25-85 min for TTR, 75-185 min for TCE, 95-220 min for TMY, and 100-260 min for TSBR. A learning curve was demonstrated for each investigated technique. These results are promising in terms of the ability of surgeons and gastroenterologists to develop these procedures into a clinical applicable version. Technical limitations were more important than differences in medical education, providing that there is a certain level of experience in both flexible endoscopy and laparoscopy, as well as a team approach.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 609
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] A review of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery - Experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting
    Della Flora, Eliana
    Wilson, Thomas G.
    Martin, Ian J.
    O'Rourke, Nicholas A.
    Maddern, Guy J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 247 (04) : 583 - 602
  • [2] Endoscopic transgastric lymphadenectomy by using EUS for selection and guidance
    Fritscher-Ravens, A
    Mosse, CA
    Ikeda, K
    Swain, P
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (02) : 302 - 306
  • [3] FUCHS KH, 2008, NOTES ODER ENDOSKOPI
  • [4] Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity
    Kalloo, AN
    Singh, VK
    Jagannath, SB
    Niiyama, H
    Hill, SL
    Vaughn, CA
    Magee, CA
    Kantsevoy, SV
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (01) : 114 - 117
  • [5] Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model
    Kantsevoy, SV
    Jagannath, SB
    Niiyama, H
    Chung, SSC
    Cotton, PB
    Gostout, CJ
    Hawes, RH
    Pasricha, PJ
    Magee, CA
    Vaughn, CA
    Barlow, D
    Shimonaka, H
    Kalloo, AN
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 62 (02) : 287 - 292
  • [6] Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: Initial experience
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    Haber, George-Pascal
    Goel, Raj K.
    Desai, Mihir M.
    Aron, Monish
    Rackley, Raymond R.
    Moore, Courtenay
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2008, 71 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [7] Surgery without scars - Report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being
    Marescaux, Jacques
    Dalleinagne, Bernard
    Perretta, Silvana
    Wattiez, Arnaud
    Mutter, Didier
    Cournaros, Dimitri
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2007, 142 (09) : 823 - 826
  • [8] MEYERS WC, 1991, NEW ENGL J MED, V324, P1073
  • [9] A Simple Technical Option for Single-Port Cholecystectomy
    Mutter, Didier
    Leroy, Joel
    Cahill, Ronan
    Marescaux, Jacques
    [J]. SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2008, 15 (04) : 332 - 333
  • [10] Diaphragm pacing with natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: potential for difficult-to-wean intensive care unit patients
    Onders, R.
    McGee, M. F.
    Marks, J.
    Chak, A.
    Schilz, R.
    Rosen, M. J.
    Ignagni, A.
    Faulx, A.
    Elmo, M. J.
    Schomisch, S.
    Ponsky, J.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 21 (03): : 475 - 479