No Differences in Population-based Readmissions After Open and Robotic-assisted Radical Cystectomy: Implications for Post-discharge Care

被引:29
作者
Borza, Tudor [1 ]
Jacobs, Bruce L.
Montgomery, Jeffrey S.
Weizer, Alon Z.
Morgan, Todd M.
Hafez, Khaled S.
Lee, Cheryl T.
Li, Benjamin Y.
Min, Hye Sung
He, Chang
Gilbert, Scott M.
Helm, Jonathan E.
Lavieri, Mariel S.
Hollenbeck, Brent K.
Skolarus, Ted A.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Dow Div Urol Hlth Serv Res, 2800 Plymouth Rd,Bldg 16, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
HOSPITAL READMISSIONS; ENHANCED RECOVERY; OUTCOMES; CANCER; COSTS; MORBIDITY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.042
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To inform whether readmission reduction strategies should consider surgical approach, we examined readmission differences between open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) using population-based data. METHODS We identified patients who underwent cystectomy between January 2010 and September 2013 based on International Classification of Diseases-9th edition codes and administrative claims from a large, national US health insurer (Clinformatics Data Mart Database, OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, MN). We assessed post-discharge health system utilization and tested for differences in readmissions after the 2 surgical approaches. RESULTS We identified 935 patients treated with cystectomy: open = 785 (84%) and RARC = 150 (16%). Patients undergoing RARC were slightly older, male, had more ileal conduit urinary reconstruction, and less need for intensive care. Index length of stay was shorter for RARC than for open surgery (7 days vs 8 days, P < .001). However, we found no differences in 30-day readmission rates (24% open vs 29% RARC, P = .26) or other readmission parameters, including readmission length of stay (5 days open vs 4 days RARC, P = .32), emergency department use (22% open vs 24% RARC, P = .86), reasons for readmission, or timing of first outpatient visits (11.5 days open vs 9 days RARC, P = .41). For both approaches, the majority of patients were readmitted within 2 weeks. CONCLUSION The surgical approach to cystectomy does not appear to impact readmissions. Strategies to reduce the readmission burden after cystectomy do not need to consider surgical approach but should focus on timing of medical contacts. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / U105
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Readmission After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: Outcomes and Predictors at 90-Day Follow-up [J].
Al-Daghmin, Ali ;
Aboumohamed, Ahmed ;
Din, Rakeeba ;
Khan, Aabroo ;
Raza, Syed Johar ;
Sztorc, Jenna ;
Mehedint, Diana ;
Sharif, Mohammad ;
Shi, Yi ;
Wilding, Gregory ;
Guru, Khurshid A. .
UROLOGY, 2014, 83 (02) :350-356
[2]   Adverse Events in Robotic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 14 Years of FDA Data [J].
Alemzadeh, Homa ;
Raman, Jaishankar ;
Leveson, Nancy ;
Kalbarczyk, Zbigniew ;
Iyer, Ravishankar K. .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (04)
[3]   Examining Reoperation and Readmission after Hepatic Surgery [J].
Barbas, Andrew S. ;
Turley, Ryan S. ;
Mallipeddi, Mohan K. ;
Lidsky, Michael E. ;
Reddy, Srinevas K. ;
White, Rebekah R. ;
Clary, Bryan M. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 216 (05) :915-923
[4]   Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Bochner, Bernard H. ;
Dalbagni, Guido ;
Sjoberg, Daniel D. ;
Silberstein, Jonathan ;
Paz, Gal E. Keren ;
Donat, S. Machele ;
Coleman, Jonathan A. ;
Mathew, Sheila ;
Vickers, Andrew ;
Schnorr, Geoffrey C. ;
Feuerstein, Michael A. ;
Rapkin, Bruce ;
Parra, Raul O. ;
Herr, Harry W. ;
Laudone, Vincent P. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (06) :1042-1050
[5]   Treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review [J].
Chou, Roger ;
Selph, Shelley S. ;
Buckley, David I. ;
Gustafson, Katie S. ;
Griffin, Jessica C. ;
Grusing, Sara E. ;
Gore, John L. .
CANCER, 2016, 122 (06) :842-851
[6]   Patient, treatment and discharge factors associated with hospital readmission within 30 days after surgical cytoreduction for epithelial ovarian carcinoma [J].
Clark, Rachel M. ;
Growdon, Whitfield B. ;
Wiechert, Andrew ;
Boruta, David ;
Del Carmen, Marcela ;
Goodman, Anne Kathryn ;
Bradford, Leslie ;
Rauh-Hain, Alejandro ;
Schorge, John O. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 130 (03) :407-410
[7]   Enhanced Recovery Protocol after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer [J].
Daneshmand, Siamak ;
Ahmadi, Hamed ;
Schuckman, Anne K. ;
Mitra, Anirban P. ;
Cai, Jie ;
Miranda, Gus ;
Djaladat, Hooman .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (01) :50-55
[8]   Perioperative Outcomes, Health Care Costs, and Survival After Robotic-assisted Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A National Comparative Effectiveness Study [J].
Hu, Jim C. ;
Chughtai, Bilal ;
O'Malley, Padraic ;
Halpern, Joshua A. ;
Mao, Jialin ;
Scherr, Douglas S. ;
Hershman, Dawn L. ;
Wright, Jason D. ;
Sedrakyan, Art .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (01) :195-202
[9]   Sharpening the focus on causes and timing of readmission after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer [J].
Hu, Michael ;
Jacobs, Bruce L. ;
Montgomery, Jeffrey S. ;
He, Chang ;
Ye, Jun ;
Zhang, Yun ;
Brathwaite, Julien ;
Morgan, Todd M. ;
Hafez, Khaled S. ;
Weizer, Alon Z. ;
Gilbert, Scott M. ;
Lee, Cheryl T. ;
Lavieri, Mariel S. ;
Helm, Jonathan E. ;
Hollenbeck, Brent K. ;
Skolarus, Ted A. .
CANCER, 2014, 120 (09) :1409-1416
[10]   Hospitalization Trends After Prostate and Bladder Surgery: Implications of Potential Payment Reforms [J].
Jacobs, Bruce L. ;
Zhang, Yun ;
Tan, Hung-Jui ;
Ye, Zaojun ;
Skolarus, Ted A. ;
Hollenbeck, Brent K. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (01) :59-65