Gemcitabine and irinotecan for patients with untreated extensive stage small cell lung cancer: SWOG 0119

被引:7
作者
Akerley, Wallace
McCoy, Jason
Hesketh, Paul J.
Goodwin, J. Wendall
Bearden, James D.
Atkins, James N.
Chansky, Kari
Crowley, John J.
Gandara, David R.
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Hlth Sci Ctr, Huntsman Canc Inst, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[3] SE CCC Community Clin Oncol Program, Goldsboro, NC USA
[4] Upstate Carolina Community Clin Oncol Program, Spartanburg, SC USA
[5] Ozarks Reg Community Clin Oncol Program, Springfield, MO USA
[6] Caritas St Elizabeths Med Ctr Boston, Boston, MA USA
[7] SW Oncol Grp, Ctr Stat, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/JTO.0b013e318060d2dc
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: To evaluate the activity of a nonplatinum-, nonctoposide-containing regimen for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer. Methods: Patients with untreated extensive stage small cell lung cancer were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle for a maximum of six cycles. Patients with brain metastases were eligible if asymptomatic or controlled after radiation. Results: Eighty-four eligible patients with untreated extensive stage small cell lung cancer with adequate organ function and a performance status of 0-2 were accrued. The median age was 64 years (range, 42-85) and 45 (54%) were women. Six cycles were completed by 28 (33%) patients. Some degree of diarrhea occurred in 57% (grade 3/4, 18%). Other grade 3/4 toxicities-were neutropenia (26%), anemia (10%), thrombocytopenia (8%), febrile neutropenia (5%), fatigue (11%), nausea (10%), and vomiting (8%). The response rate was 32% (95% confidence interval: 22%-43%) among the 81 patients with measurable disease. The median survival was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval: 7.0-9.8) with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 26% and 7%, respectively. Salvage therapy data were captured by prospective collection, and only 50% of patients were treated secondarily. Conclusion: The overall response rate with the combination of gemcitabine and irinotecan was disappointing, and the median survival rate was lower than expected. Further development of this combination in small cell lung cancer is not recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 530
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
ALBAIN KS, 1993, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V72, P1184, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930815)72:4<1184::AID-CNCR2820720409>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-Y
[3]  
Bahadori HR, 1999, ANTICANCER RES, V19, P5423
[4]   Twenty years of phase III trials for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: Perceptible progress [J].
Chute, JP ;
Chen, T ;
Feigal, E ;
Simon, R ;
Johnson, BE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (06) :1794-1801
[5]   GEMCITABINE IS AN ACTIVE NEW AGENT IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED EXTENSIVE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER (SCLC) - A STUDY OF THE NATIONAL-CANCER-INSTITUTE-OF-CANADA CLINICAL-TRIALS GROUP [J].
CORMIER, Y ;
EISENHAUER, E ;
MULDAL, A ;
GREGG, R ;
AYOUB, J ;
GOSS, G ;
STEWART, D ;
TARASOFF, P ;
WONG, D .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1994, 5 (03) :283-285
[6]  
Fujita A, 1995, Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, V22, P889
[7]  
GOLDIE JH, 1979, CANCER TREAT REP, V63, P1727
[8]  
GOLDIE JH, 1982, CANCER TREAT REP, V66, P439
[9]   TREATMENT OF LIMITED SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER WITH ETOPOSIDE AND CISPLATIN ALTERNATING WITH VINCRISTINE, DOXORUBICIN, AND CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE VERSUS CONCURRENT ETOPOSIDE, VINCRISTINE, DOXORUBICIN, AND CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE AND CHEST RADIOTHERAPY - A SOUTHWEST-ONCOLOGY-GROUP STUDY [J].
GOODMAN, GE ;
CROWLEY, JJ ;
BLASKO, JC ;
LIVINGSTON, RB ;
BECK, TM ;
DEMATTIA, MD ;
BUKOWSKI, RM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1990, 8 (01) :39-47
[10]   Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: Analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database [J].
Govindan, Ramaswamy ;
Page, Nathan ;
Morgensztern, Daniel ;
Read, William ;
Tierney, Ryan ;
Vlahiotis, Anna ;
Spitznagel, Edward L. ;
Piccirillo, Jay .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (28) :4539-4544