Benefit-risk assessment of ropivacaine in the management of postoperative pain

被引:53
作者
Zink, W [1 ]
Graf, BM [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00002018-200427140-00003
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Ropivacaine is a long-acting amide-type local anaesthetic, released for clinical use in 1996. In comparison with bupivacaine, ropivacaine is equally effective for subcutaneous infiltration, epidural and peripheral nerve block for surgery, obstetric procedures and postoperative analgesia. Nevertheless, ropivacaine differs from bupivacaine in several aspects: firstly, it is marketed as a pure S(-)-enantiomer and not as a racemate, and secondly, its lipid solubility is markedly lower. These features have been suggested to significantly improve the safety profile of ropivacaine, and indeed, numerous studies have shown that ropivacaine has less cardiovascular and CNS toxicity than racemic bupivacaine in healthy volunteers. Extensive clinical data have demonstrated that epidural 0.2% ropivacaine is nearly identical to 0.2% bupivacaine with regard to onset, quality and duration of sensory blockade for initiation and maintenance of labour analgesia. Ropivacaine also provides effective pain relief after abdominal or orthopaedic surgery, especially when given in conjunction with opioids or other adjuvants. Nevertheless, epidurally administered ropivacaine causes significantly less motor blockade at low concentrations. Whether the greater degree of blockade of nerve fibres involved in pain transmission (Adelta- and C-fibres) than of those controlling motor function (Aalpha- and Abeta-fibres) is due to a lower relative potency compared with bupivacaine or whether other physicochemical properties or stereoselectivity are involved, is still a matter of intense debate. Recommended epidural doses for postoperative or tabour pain are 20-40mg as bolus with 20-30mg as top-up dose, with an interval of greater than or equal to30 minutes. Alternatively, 0.2% ropivacaine can be given as continuous epidural infusion at a rate of 6-14 mL/h (lumbar route) or 4-10 mL/h (thoracic route). Preoperative or postoperative subcutaneous wound infiltration, during cholecystectomy or inguinal hernia repair, with ropivacame 100-175mg has been shown to be more effective than placebo and as effective as bupivacaine in reducing wound pain, whereby the vasoconstrictive potency of ropivacaine may be involved. Similar results were found in peripheral blockades on upper and lower limbs. Ropivacaine shows an identical efficacy and potency to that of bupivacaine, with similar analgesic duration over hours using single shot or continuous catheter techniques. In summary, ropivacaine, a newer long-acting local anaesthetic, has an efficacy generally similar to that of the same dose of bupivacaine with regard to postoperative pain relief, but causes less motor blockade and stronger vasoconstriction at low concentrations. Despite a significantly better safety profile of the pure S(-)-isomer of ropivacaine, the increased cost of ropivacaine may presently limit its clinical utility in postoperative pain therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1093 / 1114
页数:22
相关论文
共 200 条
[51]   A double-blind comparison of 0.25 % ropivacaine and 0.25 % bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour [J].
Eddleston, JM ;
Holland, JJ ;
Griffin, RP ;
Corbett, A ;
Horsman, EL ;
Reynolds, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 76 (01) :66-71
[52]   WOUND INFILTRATION WITH ROPIVACAINE AND BUPIVACAINE FOR PAIN AFTER INGUINAL HERNIOTOMY [J].
ERICHSEN, CJ ;
VIBITS, H ;
DAHL, JB ;
KEHLET, H .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 39 (01) :67-70
[53]   Continuous epidural ropivacaine 0.2% for analgesia after lower abdominal surgery [J].
Etches, RC ;
Writer, WDR ;
Ansley, D ;
Nydahl, PA ;
Ong, BY ;
Lui, A ;
Badner, N ;
Kawolski, S ;
Muir, H ;
Shukla, R ;
Beattie, WS .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (04) :784-790
[54]   Complications of regional anaesthesia - Incidence and prevention [J].
Faccenda, KA ;
Finucane, BT .
DRUG SAFETY, 2001, 24 (06) :413-442
[55]   A double-blind comparison of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and mepivacaine during sciatic and femoral nerve blockade [J].
Fanelli, G ;
Casati, A ;
Beccaria, P ;
Aldegheri, G ;
Berti, M ;
Tarantino, F ;
Torri, G .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (03) :597-600
[56]   COMPARATIVE MOTOR-BLOCKING EFFECTS OF BUPIVACAINE AND ROPIVACAINE, A NEW AMINO AMIDE LOCAL-ANESTHETIC, IN THE RAT AND DOG [J].
FELDMAN, HS ;
COVINO, BG .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1988, 67 (11) :1047-1052
[57]   Prolonged epidural infusions of ropivacaine [2 mg/mt) after colonic surgery:: The impact of adding fentanyl [J].
Finucane, BT ;
Ganapathy, S ;
Carli, F ;
Pridham, JN ;
Ong, BY ;
Shukla, RC ;
Kristoffersson, AHM ;
Huizar, KM ;
Nevin, K ;
Ahlén, KG .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 92 (05) :1276-1285
[58]   A double-blind comparison of ropivacaine 0.5%, 0.75%, 1.0% and bupivacaine 0.5%, injected epidurally, in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy [J].
Finucane, BT ;
Sandler, AN ;
McKenna, J ;
Reid, D ;
Milner, AL ;
Friedlander, M ;
Muzyka, D ;
OCallaghanEnright, S ;
Chan, V .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1996, 43 (05) :442-449
[59]   Ropivacaine, 0.1% plus sufentanil, 0.5 μg/ml, versus bupivacaine, 0.1% plus sufentanil, 0.5 μg/ml, using patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor -: A double-blind comparison [J].
Fischer, C ;
Blanié, P ;
Jaouën, E ;
Vayssière, C ;
Kaloul, I ;
Coltat, JC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 92 (06) :1588-1593
[60]  
FOSTER AH, 1980, ANESTH ANALG, V59, P727