A decade review of the credits obtained by LEED v2.2 certified green building projects

被引：89

作者：

Wu, Peng ^{[1
]}

Mao, Chao ^{[2
]}

Wang, Jun ^{[3
]}

Song, Yongze ^{[3
]}

Wang, Xiangyu ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Built Environm, Dept Construct Management, Bentley, WA, Australia

[2] Chongqing Univ, Fac Construct Management & Real Estate, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China

[3] Curtin Univ, Australasia Joint Res Ctr Bldg Informat Modelling, Bentley, WA, Australia

来源：

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT | 2016年 / 102卷

关键词：

LEED; Green building; Rating tool; Sustainable development; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; DEMOLITION WASTE; SUSTAINABILITY; ENERGY; CONSTRUCTION; EFFICIENCY; SELECTION; FUTURE; TOOLS;

D O I：

10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.03.026

中图分类号：

TU [建筑科学];

学科分类号：

0813 ;

摘要：

The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) is considered as one of the most successful green building rating systems. As one of the most successful versions, LEED v2.2 was launched in 2005 and has accredited more than 5000 projects globally. This paper reviews the use of LEED v2.2 and investigates the allocation pattern of LEED points by critically analysing a database of all LEED v2.2 certified projects until its certification sunset date. The results show that innovation-related points are the easiest to obtain, while energy-related and material-related points are the most difficult to obtain. Different regions, either across the world or in the US, perform differently on selected LEED v2.2 credits, especially on spatially specific credits, such as brownfield redevelopment and green power. Varied credit achievement patterns are also identified on yearly, cross-certification and cross-section levels. The study offers a useful reference for project developers to understand the LEED rating systems and for regulatory bodies to improve the rating system. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：167 / 178

页数：12

共 54 条

[1] An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: assessment of the current campus environmental management practices [J].

Alshuwaikhat, Habib M. ;

Abubakar, Ismaila .

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2008, 16 (16) :1777-1785

[2] Occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings [J].

Altomonte, Sergio ;

Schiavon, Stefano .

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 68 :66-76

[3]

ASHRAE, 2004, ANSI ASHRAE STAND 55

[4]

Athena Sustainable Materials Institute, 2002, LEED CAN AD BREEAM G

[5] Self-compacting concrete incorporating high volumes of class F fly ash -: Preliminary results [J].

Bouzoubaâ, N ;

Lachemi, M .

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2001, 31 (03) :413-420

[6]

Bowyer JL, 2007, FOREST PROD J, V57, P6

[7]

Bright U., 2005, COMP LEED GREEN GLOB

[8] City buildings - Eco-labels and shades of green! [J].

Bumett, John .

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2007, 83 (01) :29-38

[9]

Carpenter T.G., 2001, ENV CONSTRUCTION SUS, V1

[10] Optimization model for the selection of materials using a LEED-based green building rating system in Colombia [J].

Castro-Lacouture, Daniel ;

Sefair, Jorge A. ;

Florez, Laura ;

Medaglia, Andres L. .

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 44 (06) :1162-1170

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →