Reduction of inappropriate medication in older populations by electronic decision support (the PRIMA-eDS study): a qualitative study of practical implementation in primary care

被引:31
作者
Rieckert, Anja [1 ]
Sommerauer, Christina [1 ]
Krumeich, Anja [2 ]
Soennichsen, Andreas [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Witten Herdecke Univ, Fac Hlth, Inst Gen Practice & Family Med, Alfred Herrhausen Str 50, D-58448 Witten, Germany
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Lifesci, Dept Hlth Eth & Soc, Debyepl 1, NL-6229 HA Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Manchester, Sch Hlth Sci, Div Populat Hlth Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care, Oxford Rd 176, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
General practitioner; Evidence-based medicine; Computerized clinical decision support system; Deprescribing; Perceptions; Aged; DRUG-RELATED PROBLEMS; GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; POLYPHARMACY; SYSTEMS; CRITERIA; PEOPLE; APPROPRIATENESS; MULTIMORBIDITY; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-018-0789-3
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Within the EU-funded project PRIMA-eDS (Polypharmacy in chronic diseases: Reduction of Inappropriate Medication and Adverse drug events in older populations by electronic Decision Support) an electronic decision support tool (the "PRIMA-eDS-tool") was developed for general practitioners (GPs) to reduce inappropriate medication in their older polypharmacy patients. After entering patient data relevant to prescribing in an electronic case report form the physician received a comprehensive medication review (CMR) on his/her screen displaying recommendations regarding missing indications, necessary laboratory tests, evidence-base of current medication, dose adjustments for renal malfunction, potentially harmful drug-drug interactions, contra-indications, and possible adverse drug events. We set out to explore the usage of the PRIMA-eDS tool and the adoption of the recommendations provided by the CMR to optimise the tool and prepare it for its future implementation. Methods: In a qualitative study carried out in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 21 GPs using the PRIMA-eDS tool within the PRIMA-eDS study were interviewed. Interviews encompassed the GPs' attitudes regarding use of the electronic case report form and the CMR, their response to the recommendations, and the implementation of the tool into daily practice routine. The collected data were analysed applying thematic qualitative text analysis. Results: GPs found the patient data entry into the electronic case report form to be inconvenient and time-consuming. The CMR was conducted often outside practice hours and without the patient present. GPs found that the PRIMA-eDS CMR provided relevant information for and had several positive effects on the caring process. However, they encountered several barriers when wanting to change medication. Conclusions: It is unlikely that the PRIMA-eDS CMR will be used in the future as it is now as patient data entry is too time-consuming. Several barriers towards deprescribing medications were found which are common in deprescribing studies. Given the positive attitude towards the CMR, a new way of entering patient data into the PRIMA-eDS tool to create the CMR needs to be developed.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Prescriber barriers and enablers to minimising potentially inappropriate medications in adults: a systematic review and thematic synthesis [J].
Anderson, Kristen ;
Stowasser, Danielle ;
Freeman, Christopher ;
Scott, Ian .
BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (12)
[2]   Qualitative insights into general practitioners views on polypharmacy [J].
Anthierens, Sibyl ;
Tansens, Anneleen ;
Petrovic, Mirko ;
Christiaens, Thierry .
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2010, 11
[3]   Inappropriate medication use and prescribing indicators in elderly Australians [J].
Basger, Benjamin J. ;
Chen, Timothy F. ;
Moles, Rebekah J. .
DRUGS & AGING, 2008, 25 (09) :777-793
[4]   Clinical decision support systems [J].
Beeler, Patrick Emanuel ;
Bates, David Westfall ;
Hug, Balthasar Luzius .
SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2014, 144
[5]  
BEERS MH, 1991, ARCH INTERN MED, V151, P1825
[6]   Reducing Polypharmacy from the Perspectives of General Practitioners and Older Patients: A Synthesis of Qualitative Studies [J].
Bokhof, Beate ;
Junius-Walker, Ulrike .
DRUGS & AGING, 2016, 33 (04) :249-266
[7]   Factors influencing deprescribing for residents in Advanced Care Facilities: insights from General Practitioners in Australia and Sweden [J].
Bolmsjo, Beata Borgstrom ;
Palagyi, Anna ;
Keay, Lisa ;
Potter, Jan ;
Lindley, Richard I. .
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2016, 17 :1-11
[8]   Appropriateness in health care: Application to prescribing [J].
Buetow, SA ;
Sibbald, B ;
Cantrill, JA ;
Halliwell, S .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 45 (02) :261-271
[9]   Polypharmacy: Misleading, but manageable [J].
Bushardt, Reamer L. ;
Massey, Emily B. ;
Simpson, Temple W. ;
Ariail, Jane C. ;
Simpson, Kit N. .
CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2008, 3 (02) :383-389
[10]   Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy in older people: a Cochrane systematic review [J].
Cooper, Janine A. ;
Cadogan, Cathal A. ;
Patterson, Susan M. ;
Kerse, Ngaire ;
Bradley, Marie C. ;
Ryan, Cristin ;
Hughes, Carmel M. .
BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (12)