On the stability of supply chains

被引:45
作者
Daganzo, CF [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Inst Transport Studies, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1287/opre.1040.0147
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This Paper examines the stability of decentralized, multistage supply chains under arbitrary demand conditions. It looks for intrinsic properties of the inventory replenishment policies that hold for all customer demand processes and for policies with desirable properties. It is found that the overall conditions experienced by suppliers several stages removed from the final customer, e.g., the variances of the orders they receive and the inventories they keep, depend on the policy much more than on the demand process. A policy-specific but demand-independent upper bound for the order variance amplification factor of any decentralized policy is shown to exist, and its formula is presented. The bound is always tight for the suppliers at the end of a long chain so that a policy exhibits the "bullwhip effect" if and only if its bound is greater than 1. A simple necessary condition for bullwhip avoidance is also identified in terms of a policy's "gain." Gain is the marginal change in average inventory induced by a policy when there is a small but sustained change in the demand rate. It is shown that all policies with positive gain produce the bullwhip effect if they do not use future order commitments. Because manufacturers can reduce costs by operating with positive gain, this explains the prevalence of the bullwhip effect. A family of commitment-based policies that can dynamically maintain any desired inventory level for any demand rate (e.g., achieve positive gain) without the bullwhip effect is also presented. The family includes just-in-time strategies as a special case. Simulation results are used as an illustration.
引用
收藏
页码:909 / 921
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT J PRODUCTION RES
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, PRODUCTION INVENTORY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1967, PRODUCTION PLANNING
[4]  
Blackburn J. D., 1991, Time-based competition: the next battleground in American manufacturing
[5]   CAN THE PRODUCTION SMOOTHING MODEL OF INVENTORY BEHAVIOR BE SAVED [J].
BLINDER, AS .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1986, 101 (03) :431-453
[6]   Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information [J].
Chen, F ;
Drezner, Z ;
Ryan, JK ;
Simchi-Levi, D .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (03) :436-443
[7]  
Daganzo C, 2003, THEORY SUPPLY CHAINS
[8]  
DAGANZO CF, 2001, UCBITSRR20017 U CAL
[9]   Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect: A control theoretic approach [J].
Dejonckheere, J ;
Disney, SM ;
Lambrecht, MR ;
Towill, DR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 147 (03) :567-590
[10]  
ERERA A, 2001, COMMUNICATION