PHILOSOPHY'S TRAGEDY

被引:0
作者
Cooper, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Int Zentrum Philosophie, Poppelsdorfer Allee 28, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
关键词
tragedy; philosophy; genre; Quentin Skinner; Immanuel Kant;
D O I
10.1111/meta.12169
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Is tragedy, as Nietzsche declared, dead? In recent years many philosophers have reconsidered tragedy's relation to philosophy. While tragedy is deemed to contain important lessons for philosophy, there is a consensus that it remains a thing of the past. This article calls this consensus into question, arguing that it reifies tragedy, keeping tragedy at arm's length. With the interest of identifying the necessity of tragedy to philosophy, it draws from Quentin Skinner to put forward an alternative approach to genre as living form. This approach alters our understanding of the philosopher at the heart of philosophy's dialogue with tragedy, Immanuel Kant. Moreover, it shows that tragedy is closer to contemporary philosophy than we might think.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 74
页数:16
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1998, Critique of Pure Reason
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, Hegel and Greek Tragedy
  • [3] [Anonymous], DIALOGICAL IMAGINATI
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1986, GREEK TRAGEDY POLITI
  • [5] Badger Jonathan, 2012, SOPHOCLES POLITICS T
  • [6] Bakhtin Mikhail Mikhalovich., 1986, Speech Genres and Other Late Essays
  • [7] Butler Judith., 2000, Antigone's Claim: Kinship between Life and Death
  • [8] Cavell Stanley., 1979, CLAIM REASON
  • [9] Cavell Stanley., 1969, MUST WE MEAN WHAT WE
  • [10] Critchley Simon., 2009, Ethics-Politics-Subjectivity: Essays on Derrida, Levinas, and Contemporary French Thought