Dosimetric predictors of laryngeal edema

被引:91
作者
Sanguineti, Giuseppe
Adapala, Prashanth
Endres, Eugene J.
Brack, Collin
Fiorino, Claudio
Sormani, Maria Pia
Parker, Brent
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Branch, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Dept Med Phys, Med Branch, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[3] Univ Milan, Osped San Raffaele, Dept Phys, I-20127 Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Genoa, Biostat Unit, Genoa, Italy
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2007年 / 68卷 / 03期
关键词
laryngeal edema; radiotherapy; dosimetric predictors;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate dosimetric predictors of laryngeal edema after radiotherapy (RT). Methods and Materials: A total of 66 patients were selected who had squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with grossly uninvolved larynx at the time of RT, no prior major surgical operation except for neck dissection and tonsillectomy, treatment planning data available for analysis, and at least one fiberoptic examination of the larynx within 2 years from RT performed by a single observer. Both the biologically equivalent mean dose at 2 Gy per fraction and the cumulative biologic dose-volume histogram of the larynx were extracted for each patient. Laryngeal edema was prospectively scored after treatment. Time to endpoint, moderate or worse laryngeal edema (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 2+), was calculated with log rank test from the date of treatment end. Results: At a median follow-up of 17.1 months (range, 0.4-50.0 months), the risk of Grade 2+ edema was 58.9% +/- 7%. Mean dose to the larynx, V30, V40, V50, V60, and V70 were significantly correlated with Grade 2+ edema at univariate analysis. At multivariate analysis, mean laryngeal dose (continuum, hazard ratio, 1.11; 95 % confidence interval, 1.06-1.15; p < 0.001), and positive neck stage at RT (NO-x vs. N +, hazard ratio, 3.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-9.58; p = 0.008) were the only independent predictors. Further stratification showed that, to minimize the risk of Grade 2+ edema, the mean dose to the larynx has to be kept <= 43.5 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction. Conclusion: Laryngeal edema is strictly correlated with various dosimetric parameters; mean dose to the larynx should be kept <= 43.5 Gy. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 749
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]  
Lee N, 2005, HEAD NECK-J SCI SPEC, V29, P387
[22]   Exile and cultural hegemony: Spanish intellectuals in Mexico, 1939-1975 [J].
Long, R .
WORLD LITERATURE TODAY, 2003, 77 (3-4) :148-148
[23]   Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the standard management of head and neck cancer: Promises and pitfalls [J].
Mendenhall, William M. ;
Amdur, Robert J. ;
Palta, Jatinder R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (17) :2618-2623
[24]   COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND SPLIT-COURSE RADIOTHERAPY AS PRIMARY-TREATMENT IN CARCINOMA OF THE LARYNX [J].
OVERGAARD, J ;
HJELMHANSEN, M ;
JOHANSEN, LV ;
ANDERSEN, AP .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1988, 27 (02) :147-152
[25]  
*R T O G, 2005, PHAS STUD IMRT CHEM
[26]  
*RTOG, 2006, PHAS 1 2 STUD CONF I
[27]   Sparing of the submandibular glands by intensity modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer [J].
Saarilahti, K ;
Kouri, M ;
Collan, J ;
Kangasmäki, A ;
Atula, T ;
Joensuu, H ;
Tenhunen, M .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 78 (03) :270-275
[28]   Accelerated hyperfractionated intensity modulated radiotherapy (AHI) for T2-3 oropharyngeal carcinoma: Preliminary results from a phase I-II study [J].
Sanguineti, G ;
Pou, AM ;
Newlands, SD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (02) :S380-S380
[29]   Are neck nodal volumes drawn on CT slices covered by standard three-field technique? [J].
Sanguineti, G ;
Culp, LR ;
Endres, EJ ;
Bayouth, JE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (03) :725-742
[30]   Is there a "mucosa-sparing" benefit of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer? [J].
Sanguineti, Giuseppe ;
Endres, Eugene J. ;
Gunn, Brandon G. ;
Parker, Brent .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03) :931-938