The burden of a brain tumor: guiding patient centric care in neuro-oncology

被引:10
作者
Loughan, Ashlee R. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Reid, Morgan [3 ]
Willis, Kelcie D. [3 ]
Davies, Alexandria [3 ]
Boutte, Rachel L. [4 ]
Barrett, Sarah [5 ]
Lo, Karen [5 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, VCU Massey Canc Ctr, Sch Med, Div Neuro Oncol,Dept Neurol, 1201 East Marshall St, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] VCU Massey Canc Ctr, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Psychol, Box 2018, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[4] Rush Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Med, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
关键词
Quality-of-life; Brain tumor; Focus group; Interdisciplinary; PRogram development; Patient centric; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA; EMOTIONAL DISTRESS; END-POINTS; CANCER; DEPRESSION; SURVIVAL; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1007/s11060-022-03993-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Brain tumor patients report an overwhelming sense of uncertainty when navigating the course of their terminal disease. Historically, organizational experts and/or treating physicians have established neuro-oncology programs. However, given the disease burden and incurable nature of current medical treatments, patient-centric care should be prioritized alongside institutional and academic objectives. Integrating patient perspectives into interdisciplinary programmatic development can improve comprehensive care and empower patients to advocate for their own quality healthcare needs. Methods Data was derived from four focus groups with adult brain tumor patients (N = 15; M-age = 46 years, 53% female). A trained moderator led each 90-min group and posed semi-structured questions regarding patients' care needs throughout their neuro-oncological disease trajectory. Emphasis was placed on quality of life and psychological distress reduction for both patients and their loved ones. Common themes were identified via thematic content analysis using NVivo software. A high inter-rater reliability (M-kappa = 0.92, range= 0.85-0.93) was achieved. Results Six distinct themes emerged, where the frequency of each theme ranged from 12.5 to 23.3%. Specifically, patients discussed relational concerns, navigation of interdisciplinary care, neurobehavioral impacts, emotional responses to stressors, existential concerns, and caregiver support. A discussion of themes follows. Conclusions It is imperative that we include the patient perspective in the development of neuro-oncology programs; considering the quality of survival in addition to quantity. Neuro-oncology quality care themes identified were relational concerns, navigating interdisciplinary care, neurobehavioral impact, emotional response to stressors, existential concerns, and caregiver support. A paramount concentration for comprehensive neuro-oncology programs must include patients' quality needs.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 498
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Journal of neuro-oncology: Childhood brain tumors
    Packer, RJ
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2005, 75 (03) : 237 - 237
  • [22] Initial psycho-oncological counselling in neuro-oncology: analysis of topics and needs of brain tumour patients
    Schipmann, Stephanie
    Molina, Eric Suero
    Frasch, Anna
    Stummer, Walter
    Wiewrodt, Dorothee
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 136 (03) : 505 - 514
  • [23] Landscape of pediatric neuro-oncology care in China
    Liu, Anthony P. Y.
    Sun, Chenchen
    Qaddoumi, Ibrahim
    PEDIATRIC MEDICINE, 2023, 6
  • [24] Glioma patient-reported outcome assessment in clinical care and research: a Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology collaborative report
    Armstrong, Terri S.
    Dirven, Linda
    Arons, David
    Bates, Amanda
    Chang, Susan M.
    Coens, Corneel
    Espinasse, Claire
    Gilbert, Mark R.
    Jenkinson, David
    Kluetz, Paul
    Mendoza, Tito
    Rubinstein, Larry
    Sul, Joohee
    Weller, Michael
    Wen, Patrick Y.
    van den Bent, Martin J.
    Taphoorn, Martin J. B.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2020, 21 (02) : E97 - E103
  • [25] Tumor type, epilepsy burden, and seizure documentation: experiences at a single center neuro-oncology clinic
    Bushara, Omar
    Guzner, Alex
    Bachman, Elizabeth
    Stupp, Roger
    Lukas, Rimas, V
    Templer, Jessica W.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 8 (05) : 581 - 588
  • [26] Quantifying the utility of a multidisciplinary neuro-oncology tumor board
    Khalafallah, Adham M.
    Jimenez, Adrian E.
    Romo, Carlos G.
    Kamson, David Olayinka
    Kleinberg, Lawrence
    Weingart, Jon
    Brem, Henry
    Grossman, Stuart A.
    Mukherjee, Debraj
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 135 (01) : 87 - 92
  • [27] Genetic counseling and tumor predisposition in neuro-oncology practice
    Dunbar, Erin M.
    Eppolito, Amanda
    Henson, John W.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2016, 3 (01) : 17 - 28
  • [28] Neuro-oncology Multidisciplinary Clinic and Improvements in Patient Outcome
    Kubicek, Gregory J.
    Yocum, Nora
    Thomas, Christina
    Goldman, Howard W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2020, 43 (11): : 798 - 801
  • [29] Caring for patients with brain tumor: The patient and care giver perspectives
    Mezue, W. C.
    Draper, P.
    Watson, R.
    Mathew, B. G.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 14 (03) : 368 - 372
  • [30] Systematic review on the use of patient-reported outcome measures in brain tumor studies: part of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Patient-Reported Outcome (RANO-PRO) initiative
    Dirven, Linda
    Vos, Maartje E.
    Walbert, Tobias
    Armstrong, Terri S.
    Arons, David
    van den Bent, Martin J.
    Blakeley, Jaishri
    Brown, Paul D.
    Bulbeck, Helen
    Chang, Susan M.
    Coens, Comeel
    Gilbert, Mark R.
    Grant, Robin
    Jalali, Rakesh
    Leach, Danielle
    Leeper, Heather
    Mendoza, Tito
    Nayak, Lakshmi
    Oliver, Kathy
    Reijneveld, Jaap C.
    Le Rhun, Emilie
    Rubinstein, Larry
    Weller, Michael
    Wen, Patrick Y.
    Taphoom, Martin J. B.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 8 (04) : 417 - 425