Exploring the Patterns of Funded Papers in Social Science in Taiwan

被引:0
作者
Dong, Huei-Ru [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fu Jen Catholic Univ, Res & Dev Ctr Phys Educ Hlth & Informat Technol, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, New Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Ctr Res Econometr Theory & Applicat, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
JOURNAL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION STUDIES | 2021年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
Funding; Funded Paper; Social Science; Bibliometrics; Citation Impact; FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; RESEARCH GRANTS; IMPACT; CITATION;
D O I
10.6182/jlis.202106_19(1).115
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This study used bibliometrics to analyze the characteristics of funded papers in the social sciences in Taiwan from 2015 to 2019, including the number of funded papers, funded paper ratio, document types, fields, type of publishing organizations, journal impact, and paper citation impact. The results indicate that the number of funded papers and the funded paper ratio of SSCI papers from Taiwan have both increased. In addition to articles and reviews, conference papers are a major type of funded paper for local SSCI papers. In terms of fields, the nontraditional social sciences, such as environmental sciences, psychiatry, and public/environmental & occupational health, have a particularly high funded paper ratio. However, the number of funded papers and funded paper ratio is the highest in the field of education & educational research. The fields of economics, management, and business have a large number of funded papers but a low funded paper ratio. Universities are the main funded institutions, but hospitals have the highest funded paper ratio. Funded papers tend to have higher paper citation impacts. Therefore, funding positively affects the productivity and impact of SSCI papers from Taiwan.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 137
页数:23
相关论文
共 47 条
[2]   What characterises funded biomedical research? Evidence from a basic and a clinical domain [J].
Alvarez-Bornstein, Belen ;
Diaz-Faes, Adrian A. ;
Bordons, Maria .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2019, 119 (02) :805-825
[3]   Funding acknowledgments in the Web of Science: completeness and accuracy of collected data [J].
Alvarez-Bornstein, Belen ;
Morillo, Fernanda ;
Bordons, Maria .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2017, 112 (03) :1793-1812
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Web of Science Core Collection Help
[5]   Developing a methodology to assess the impact of research grant funding: A mixed methods approach [J].
Bloch, Carter ;
Sorensen, Mads P. ;
Graversen, Ebbe K. ;
Schneider, Jesper W. ;
Schmidt, Evanthia Kalpazidou ;
Aagaard, Kaare ;
Mejlgaard, Niels .
EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2014, 43 :105-117
[6]   Metrics associated with NIH funding: a high-level view [J].
Boyack, Kevin W. ;
Jordan, Paul .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2011, 18 (04) :423-431
[7]   Indicator-assisted evaluation and funding of research:: Visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers [J].
Boyack, KW ;
Börner, K .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 54 (05) :447-461
[8]   The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science [J].
Braun, D .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1998, 27 (08) :807-821
[9]  
Chang YuWei, J LIBR INFORM STUD, V8, P55, DOI [10.6182/ jlis.2010.8(2).055, DOI 10.6182/JLIS.2010.8(2).055]
[10]   Money for science?: The impact of research grants on academic output [J].
Chudnovsky, Daniel ;
Lopez, Andres ;
Rossi, Martin A. ;
Ubfal, Diego .
FISCAL STUDIES, 2008, 29 (01) :75-87