On the Potential of the Particle Swarm Algorithm for the Optimization of Detailed Kinetic Mechanisms. Comparison with the Genetic Algorithm

被引:13
作者
El Rassy, Elissa [1 ]
Delaroque, Aurelie [2 ]
Sambou, Patrick [2 ]
Chakravarty, Harish Kumar [2 ]
Matynia, Alexis [2 ]
机构
[1] Lab Therm & Energie Nantes, UMR 6607, F-44306 Nantes 03, France
[2] Sorbonne Univ, CNRS, Inst Jean Le Rond dAlembert, UMR 7190, F-75005 Paris, France
关键词
COMBUSTION; PARAMETERS; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jpca.1c02095
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This work investigates the potential of the particle swarm algorithm for the optimization of detailed kinetic mechanisms. To this end, empirical analysis has been conducted to evaluate the efficiency of this algorithm in comparison with the genetic algorithm (GA). Both algorithms are built on evolutionary processes according to which a randomly defined population will evolve, over the iterations, toward an optimal solution. The GA is driven by crossover and mutation operators and by a selection method. The particle swarm optimization (PSO) approach is based on the experience of each individual and on the group experience to control the direction of its evolution. The success of the application of an algorithm can be sensitive to the choice of operators and the relative importance attributed to them. Therefore, to make the comparison as rigorous as possible, about a dozen strategies were proposed for each algorithm and the performances were evaluated. A degraded version of the GRI-Mech 3.0 mechanism (i.e., containing some of the kinetic constants randomly modified) was generated and then optimized by the two evolutionary algorithms to recover the predictive character of the original mechanism. The results show that for the majority of the proposed strategies, PSO is more efficient than the GA, whereas the latter is generally much more used for the optimization of detailed kinetic mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:5180 / 5189
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] A Survey of Particle Swarm Optimization Applications in Electric Power Systems
    AlRashidi, M. R.
    El-Hawary, M. E.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2009, 13 (04) : 913 - 918
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, PARTICLE SWARM OPTIM
  • [3] Back T., 1997, Handbook of Evolutionary Computation
  • [4] A genetic algorithm with decimal coding for the estimation of kinetic and energetic parameters
    Balland, L
    Estel, L
    Cosmao, JM
    Mouhab, N
    [J]. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2000, 50 (01) : 121 - 135
  • [5] Bock H., 1981, SPRINGER SERIES CHEM, P102
  • [6] Building-up virtual optimized mechanism for flame modeling
    Cailler, Melody
    Darabiha, Nasser
    Veynante, Denis
    Fiorina, Benoit
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2017, 36 (01) : 1251 - 1258
  • [7] AB-INITIO COMPUTATION OF COMBUSTION KINETICS .1. VINYL RADICAL PLUS O-2
    CARPENTER, BK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1995, 99 (24) : 9801 - 9810
  • [8] Clerc M., 1999, C EVOLUTIONARY COMPU, VVolume 3, P1951, DOI [DOI 10.1109/CEC.1999.785513, 10.1109/CEC.1999.785513]
  • [9] Particle swarm optimization: Basic concepts, variants and applications in power systems
    del Valle, Yamille
    Venayagamoorthy, Ganesh Kumar
    Mohagheghi, Salman
    Hernandez, Jean-Carlos
    Harley, Ronald G.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2008, 12 (02) : 171 - 195
  • [10] Kinetic parameters estimation of pinus sylvestris pyrolysis by Kissinger-Kai method coupled with Particle Swarm Optimization and global sensitivity analysis
    Ding, Yanming
    Zhang, Yu
    Zhang, Jiaqing
    Zhou, Ru
    Ren, Zeyu
    Guo, Hailin
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 293