Is a Fixed Value for the Least Significant Change Appropriate?

被引:26
|
作者
Nelson, Lisa [1 ]
Gulenchyn, Karen Y. [1 ]
Atthey, Mark [1 ]
Webber, Colin E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamilton Hlth Sci, Dept Nucl Med, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
关键词
Body mass index; DXA precision; least significant change; spine and hip BMD; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; PRECISION ASSESSMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; WOMEN; MUSCLE; DXA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocd.2009.10.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The least significant change (LSC) represents the smallest difference between successive measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) that can be considered to be a real change and not attributable to chance. The LSC is derived from same-day in vivo BNID precision measurements. Our first objective was to determine if the LSC differs between technologists. Our second objective was to determine if patient body size influenced the LSC. Each of 8 technologists measured same-day precision in groups of 30 patients for the lumbar spine and the total trochanter and neck regions of the proximal femur. At the spine, precision ranged from 0.008 to 0.011 g/cm(2) and did not differ between technologists. Precision for the total region of the left proximal femur ranged from 0.006 to 0.016 g/cm(2) and did differ between technologists. For the trochanter and neck regions, precision ranged from 0.008 to 0.013 g/cm(2) for the former and from 0.010 to 0.020 g/cm(2) for the latter, again, with inter-technologist differences. The LSC for the lumbar spine increased linearly from 0.022 to 0.031 g/cm(2) when body mass index (BMI) increased from 19.5 to 31.3 kg/m(2). In contrast, there was no discernable impact of BMI on the LSC for any of the proximal femur regions. The LSC at the spine is determined by the patient, whereas the LSC at the femur is determined by the technologist. Use of a single value for the LSC will lead to misinterpretations of the significance of BMD changes at both the spine and the proximal femur.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 23
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The least significant change on bone mineral density scan increased in patients with higher degrees of obesity
    Dorilleau, Claire
    Kanagaratnam, Lukshe
    Charlot, Isabelle
    Hittinger, Ambre
    Bertin, Eric
    Salmon, Jean-Hugues
    Geoffroy, Marion
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 36 (01)
  • [2] A generalized least significant change for individuals measured on different DXA systems
    Shepherd, John A.
    Lu, Ying
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2007, 10 (03) : 249 - 258
  • [3] Estimating Lumbar Spine Least Significant Change for Fewer than Four Vertebrae: The Manitoba BMD Registry
    Rosen, Harold
    Szalat, Auryan
    Leslie, William D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2024, 27 (02)
  • [4] Cross-calibration, Least Significant Change and Quality Assurance in Multiple Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Scanner Environments: 2019 ISCD Official Position
    Jankowski, Lawrence G.
    Warner, Sarah
    Gaither, Ken
    Lenchik, Leon
    Fan, Bo
    Lu, Ying
    Shepherd, John
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2019, 22 (04) : 472 - 483
  • [5] Evaluation of bone mineral density in the monitoring of the effects of breast cancer treatment with aromatase inhibitors: The importance of the least significant change
    Pacifici, Stefano
    IMAGEN DIAGNOSTICA, 2014, 5 (02): : 49 - 54
  • [6] Some Physical and Clinical Factors Influencing the Measurement of Precision Error, Least Significant Change, and Bone Mineral Density in Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
    Frimeth, Jeffrey
    Galiano, Eduardo
    Webster, Dave
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2010, 13 (01) : 29 - 35
  • [7] A Trimodality Comparison of Volumetric Bone Imaging Technologies. Part II: 1-Yr Change, Long-Term Precision, and Least Significant Change
    Wong, Andy K. O.
    Beattie, Karen A.
    Min, Kevin K. H.
    Merali, Zamir
    Webber, Colin E.
    Gordon, Christopher L.
    Papaioannou, Alexandra
    Cheung, Angela M. W.
    Adachi, Jonathan D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2015, 18 (02) : 260 - 269
  • [8] Comparing BMD results between two similar DXA systems using the generalized least significant change
    Shepherd, John A.
    Morgan, Sarah L.
    Lu, Ying
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2008, 11 (02) : 237 - 242
  • [9] Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Measured Regional Body Composition Least Significant Change: Effect of Region of Interest and Gender in Athletes
    Buehring, Bjoern
    Krueger, Diane
    Libber, Jessie
    Heiderscheit, Bryan
    Sanfilippo, Jennifer
    Johnson, Brian
    Haller, Irina
    Binkley, Neil
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2014, 17 (01) : 121 - 128
  • [10] Least significant changes and monitoring time intervals for high-resolution pQCT-derived bone outcomes in postmenopausal women
    Kawalilak, C. E.
    Johnston, J. D.
    Olszynski, W. P.
    Kontulainen, S. A.
    JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL & NEURONAL INTERACTIONS, 2015, 15 (02) : 190 - 196