DebatesHypothesis testing in hydrology: A subsurface perspective

被引:9
作者
Neuweiler, Insa [1 ]
Helmig, Rainer [2 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Fluid Mech & Environm Phys Civil Engn, Hannover, Germany
[2] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Modelling Hydraul & Environm Syst, Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
model hypotheses; subsurface flow modeling; model development; DRAINAGE FRONTS; FLOW; MEDIA; UNCERTAINTY; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1002/2016WR020047
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Models for flow in environmental systems are subject to uncertainty. Models can thus be interpreted as hypotheses on the validity of the underlying model assumptions. One important source of uncertainty in models for flow and transport processes in the subsurface is the model concept. While uncertain model parameters or forcing terms can be captured as random processes and random fields, this type of uncertainty cannot be included into a model in a straightforward manner. This is particularly true if established model descriptions of a given process are not known or are still being debated. In this contribution, we outline several examples of subsurface flow and transport modeling where uncertainty of the model concept plays an important role. We discuss the need for the development of methods and standards to deal with this type of uncertainty in model hypothesis testing.
引用
收藏
页码:1784 / 1791
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Optimisation of decision making under uncertainty throughout field lifetime: A fractured reservoir example [J].
Arnold, Dan ;
Demyanov, Vasily ;
Christie, Mike ;
Bakay, Alexander ;
Gopa, Konstantin .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2016, 95 :123-139
[2]   DebatesHypothesis testing in hydrology: Pursuing certainty versus pursuing uberty [J].
Baker, Victor R. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2017, 53 (03) :1770-1778
[3]   Anomalous transport in random fracture networks [J].
Berkowitz, B ;
Scher, H .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1997, 79 (20) :4038-4041
[4]   Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment [J].
Beven, K .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2002, 458 (2026) :2465-2484
[5]   Pore-scale imaging and modelling [J].
Blunt, Martin J. ;
Bijeljic, Branko ;
Dong, Hu ;
Gharbi, Oussama ;
Iglauer, Stefan ;
Mostaghimi, Peyman ;
Paluszny, Adriana ;
Pentland, Christopher .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2013, 51 :197-216
[6]   HydroGeoSphere: A Fully Integrated, Physically Based Hydrological Model [J].
Brunner, Philip ;
Simmons, Craig T. .
GROUND WATER, 2012, 50 (02) :170-176
[7]   Improving the theoretical underpinnings of process-based hydrologic models [J].
Clark, Martyn P. ;
Schaefli, Bettina ;
Schymanski, Stanislaus J. ;
Samaniego, Luis ;
Luce, Charles H. ;
Jackson, Bethanna M. ;
Freer, Jim E. ;
Arnold, Jeffrey R. ;
Moore, R. Dan ;
Istanbulluoglu, Erkan ;
Ceola, Serena .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2016, 52 (03) :2350-2365
[8]   Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling [J].
Clark, Martyn P. ;
Kavetski, Dmitri ;
Fenicia, Fabrizio .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2011, 47
[9]   A phase field model of unsaturated flow [J].
Cueto-Felgueroso, L. ;
Juanes, R. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2009, 45
[10]   Fractional advection-dispersion equation: A classical mass balance with convolution-Fickian flux [J].
Cushman, JH ;
Ginn, TR .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2000, 36 (12) :3763-3766