Occupant Satisfaction in Sustainable and Conventional Higher Education Buildings

被引:3
作者
Szery, Kim [1 ]
Sunindijo, Riza Yosia [1 ]
机构
[1] UNSW Sydney, Fac Built Environm, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
EURASIAN BUSINESS PERSPECTIVES | 2019年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
Australia; Higher education; Occupant satisfaction; Sustainable buildings; Thermal comfort; THERMAL COMFORT; GREEN BUILDINGS; PERFORMANCE; OFFICES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-18652-4_8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The higher education sector as a bastion of sustainability research has embarked in continual efforts to make its buildings more sustainable. Besides being environmentally friendly and economically feasible in the long run, there are perceptions that sustainable buildings are more user friendly and that their occupants are more satisfied than those in conventional buildings. However, research findings in this particular aspect of sustainability are inconclusive and even conflicting. Therefore, this research aims to study the occupant satisfaction of sustainable and conventional buildings in a higher education institution in Australia. The results show that generally there is no significant difference in occupant satisfaction between sustainable and conventional buildings. A goal of sustainable buildings to improve the wellbeing of building occupants apparently has not been achieved based on the findings of this research. There is a possibility that the development of sustainable buildings mainly focuses on the environmental aspect while the social aspect tends to be neglected. The results further show that focusing on thermal comfort is the most effective way to improve occupant satisfaction. Future developments of sustainable buildings should evolve further and find the right balance among the triple bottom line of sustainability so that they truly are sustainable buildings.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 111
页数:17
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Abbaszadeh S, 2006, 8 INT C EXH HLTH BUI
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2003, A Report to California's Sustainable Building Task Force
  • [3] Green offices in Australia: a user perception survey
    Armitage, Lynne
    Murugan, Ann
    Kato, Hikari
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE REAL ESTATE, 2011, 13 (03) : 169 - +
  • [4] Baird G., 2010, Sustainable buildings in practice: what the users think
  • [5] Brager G.S., 2004, ASHRAE T, V110, P17
  • [6] Brill M., 2001, DISPROVING WIDESPREA
  • [7] Re-contextualizing the notion of comfort
    Cole, Raymond J.
    Robinson, John
    Brown, Zosia
    O'Shea, Meg
    [J]. BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2008, 36 (04) : 323 - 336
  • [8] The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: a systematic review of the literature
    De Croon, EM
    Sluiter, JK
    Kuijer, PPFM
    Frings-Dresen, MHW
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2005, 48 (02) : 119 - 134
  • [9] Benefits of green offices in the UK: Analysis from examples built in the 1990s
    Edwards, Brian
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 14 (03) : 190 - 204
  • [10] Doing Well by Doing Good? Green Office Buildings
    Eichholtz, Piet
    Kok, Nils
    Quigley, John M.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (05) : 2492 - 2509