Protected areas and freshwater biodiversity: a novel systematic review distils eight lessons for effective conservation

被引:121
作者
Acreman, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Hughes, Kathy A. [3 ]
Arthington, Angela H. [4 ]
Tickner, David [3 ]
Duenas, Manuel-Angel [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford OX10 8BB, Oxon, England
[2] Hydroecol Consulting Ltd, Wallingford, Oxon, England
[3] WWF UK, Woking, Surrey, England
[4] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
conservation evidence; lakes; national parks; nature reserves; protected areas; Ramsar; rivers; systematic review; wetlands; GLOBAL ASSESSMENT; FISH ASSEMBLAGES; NATIONAL-PARK; RIVER-BASIN; POPULATION; DIVERSITY; STREAMS; MANAGEMENT; WETLANDS; HABITAT;
D O I
10.1111/conl.12684
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Protected areas are a global cornerstone of biodiversity conservation and restoration. Yet freshwater biodiversity is continuing to decline rapidly. To date there has been no formal review of the effectiveness of protected areas for conserving or restoring biodiversity in rivers, lakes, and wetlands. We present the first assessment using a systematic review of the published scientific evidence of the effectiveness of freshwater protected areas. Systematic searches returned 2,586 separate publications, of which 44 provided quantitative evidence comprising 75 case studies. Of these, 38 reported positive, 25 neutral, and 12 negative outcomes for freshwater biodiversity conservation. Analysis revealed variable relationships between conservation effectiveness and factors such as taxa assessed, protected area size and characteristics, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) protected area category, and ecoregion. Lack of effectiveness was attributed to many anthropogenic factors, including fishing (often with a lack of law enforcement), water management (abstraction, dams, and flow regulation), habitat degradation, and invasive non-native species. Drawing on the review and wider literature we distil eight lessons to enhance the effectiveness of protected areas for freshwater biodiversity conservation. We urge policymakers, protected area managers, and those who fund them to invest in well-designed research and monitoring programs and publication of evidence of protected area effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Freshwater ecoregions of the world:: A new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation [J].
Abell, Robin ;
Thieme, Michele L. ;
Revenga, Carmen ;
Bryer, Mark ;
Kottelat, Maurice ;
Bogutskaya, Nina ;
Coad, Brian ;
Mandrak, Nick ;
Balderas, Salvador Contreras ;
Bussing, William ;
Stiassny, Melanie L. J. ;
Skelton, Paul ;
Allen, Gerald R. ;
Unmack, Peter ;
Naseka, Alexander ;
Ng, Rebecca ;
Sindorf, Nikolai ;
Robertson, James ;
Armijo, Eric ;
Higgins, Jonathan V. ;
Heibel, Thomas J. ;
Wikramanayake, Eric ;
Olson, David ;
Lopez, Hugo L. ;
Reis, Roberto E. ;
Lundberg, John G. ;
Perez, Mark H. Sabaj ;
Petry, Paulo .
BIOSCIENCE, 2008, 58 (05) :403-414
[2]   Looking Beyond the Fenceline: Assessing Protection Gaps for the World's Rivers [J].
Abell, Robin ;
Lehner, Bernhard ;
Thieme, Michele ;
Linke, Simon .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (04) :384-394
[3]   Do terrestrial protected areas conserve freshwater fish diversity? Results from the Western Ghats of India [J].
Abraham, Robin Kurian ;
Kelkar, Nachiket .
ORYX, 2012, 46 (04) :544-553
[4]   Measuring benefits of protected area management: trends across realms and research gaps for freshwater systems [J].
Adams, Vanessa M. ;
Setterfield, Samantha A. ;
Douglas, Michael M. ;
Kennard, Mark J. ;
Ferdinands, Keith .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 370 (1681)
[5]  
[Anonymous], LIV PLAN REP 2018 RI
[6]  
[Anonymous], AS CARP ACT PLAN FIS
[7]  
[Anonymous], BIOL CONSERVATION
[8]  
[Anonymous], CONVENTION BIOL DIVE
[9]  
[Anonymous], RIVERINE RESERVES CO
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2018, GLOBAL WETLAND OUTLO