Evaluation of six different rapid methods for nucleic acid detection of SARS-COV-2 virus

被引:17
作者
Mahmoud, Sally A. [1 ]
Ganesan, Subhashini [2 ]
Ibrahim, Esra [1 ]
Thakre, Bhagyashree [1 ]
Teddy, Juliet G. [1 ]
Raheja, Preety [1 ]
Zaher, Walid A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Biogenix Lab G42, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[2] G42 Healthcare, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
COVID-19; nucleic acid tests; rapid tests; SARS-CoV-2;
D O I
10.1002/jmv.27090
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
In the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic there is a mass screening of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) happening around the world due to the extensive spread of the infections. There is a high demand for rapid diagnostic tests to expedite the identification of cases and to facilitate early isolation and control spread. Hence this study evaluates six different rapid nucleic acid detection assays that are commercially available for SARS-CoV-2 virus detection. Nasopharyngeal samples were collected from 4981 participants and were tested for the SARS-CoV-2 virus by the gold standard real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method and with one of these six rapid methods of detection. Evaluation of the rapid nucleic acid detection assays was done by comparing the results of these rapid methods with the gold standard RT-qPCR results for SARS-COV-2 detection. AQ-TOP had the highest sensitivity (98%) and a strong kappa value of 0.943 followed by Genechecker and Abbot ID NOW. The POCKIT (ii RT-PCR) assay had the highest test accuracy of 99.29% followed by Genechecker and Cobas Liat. Atila iAMP showed the highest percentage of invalid reports (35.5%) followed by AQ-TOP with 6% and POCKIT with 3.7% of invalid reports. Genechecker system, Abbott ID NOW, and Cobas Liat were found to have the best performance and agreement when compared with the standard RT-PCR for COVID-19 detection. With further research, these rapid tests have the potential to be employed in large-scale screening of COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页码:5538 / 5543
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [11] Comparative Study of Sensitivity, Linearity, and Resistance to Inhibition of Digital and Nondigital Polymerase Chain Reaction and Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assays for Quantification of Human Cytomegalovirus
    Nixon, Gavin
    Garson, Jeremy A.
    Grant, Paul
    Nastouli, Eleni
    Foy, Carole A.
    Huggett, Jim F.
    [J]. ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2014, 86 (09) : 4387 - 4394
  • [12] Comparison of Abbott ID Now, DiaSorin Simplexa, and CDC FDA Emergency Use Authorization Methods for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Nasopharyngeal and Nasal Swabs from Individuals Diagnosed with COVID-19
    Rhoads, Daniel D.
    Cherian, Sree S.
    Roman, Katharine
    Stempak, Lisa M.
    Schmotzer, Christine L.
    Sadri, Navid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (08)
  • [13] Rapid Direct Nucleic Acid Amplification Test without RNA Extraction for SARS-CoV-2 Using a Portable PCR Thermocycler
    Wee, Soon Keong
    Sivalingam, Suppiah Paramalingam
    Yap, Eric Peng Huat
    [J]. GENES, 2020, 11 (06) : 1 - 13
  • [14] Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019
    Woelfel, Roman
    Corman, Victor M.
    Guggemos, Wolfgang
    Seilmaier, Michael
    Zange, Sabine
    Mueller, Marcel A.
    Niemeyer, Daniela
    Jones, Terry C.
    Vollmar, Patrick
    Rothe, Camilla
    Hoelscher, Michael
    Bleicker, Tobias
    Bruenink, Sebastian
    Schneider, Julia
    Ehmann, Rosina
    Zwirglmaier, Katrin
    Drosten, Christian
    Wendtner, Clemens
    [J]. NATURE, 2020, 581 (7809) : 465 - +
  • [15] World Health Organization, 2020, LAB TEST STRAT REC C
  • [16] Rapid and visual detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) by a reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay
    Yan, C.
    Cui, J.
    Huang, L.
    Du, B.
    Chen, L.
    Xue, G.
    Li, S.
    Zhang, W.
    Zhao, L.
    Sun, Y.
    Yao, H.
    Li, N.
    Zhao, H.
    Feng, Y.
    Liu, S.
    Zhang, Q.
    Liu, D.
    Yuan, J.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2020, 26 (06) : 773 - 779
  • [17] Clinical Evaluation of Three Sample-to-Answer Platforms for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Zhen, Wei
    Smith, Elizabeth
    Manji, Ryhana
    Schron, Deborah
    Berry, Gregory J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (08)