A protocol to assess the seismic criticality of existing small concrete dams

被引:4
作者
Frigo, Barbara [1 ]
Fantilli, Alessandro Pasquale [1 ]
De Biagi, Valerio [1 ]
Veylon, Guillaume [2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Dept Struct Geotech & Bldg Engn, Turin, Italy
[2] Inst Natl Rech Sci & Technol Environm & Agr, RECOVER Res Unit, Aix En Provence, France
关键词
Concrete dams; earthquake; fixed weirs; structural vulnerability; seismic risk; concrete strength; protocol of interventions; multi-criteria analysis; PERFORMANCE; DURATION; STRENGTH; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/15732479.2017.1402066
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Dams are critical infrastructures whose failure would entail serious consequences for community safety. Although large dams represent the most dangerous items, small size dams may be critical, as a large number of these constructions are built in the proximity to inhabited zones. Earthquake is one of the hazards that may affect an existing dam. To assess safety and plan investments, dam owners need to create prioritisation sequences of interventions through a protocol considering technical, political and societal aspects. It is presented herein a specific procedure, based on a multi-criteria analysis with a rapid screening survey of the infrastructures, which addresses to classify the seismic criticality of dams considering the effects (in terms of loss of life and property) of a failure scenario subsequent to an earthquake. A protocol is used to define a prioritisation of interventions that mitigate the seismic risk. It has been applied to a group of 9 small concrete dams and 17 fixed weirs, built from 1920 to 1990 in Aosta Valley (Italy). As a result, about 30% of the existing dams, which are more vulnerable than fixed weirs, shows the highest level of seismic criticality, and needs to be retrofitted in accordance with the current standards.
引用
收藏
页码:1197 / 1206
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Almog E., 2001, MODES DAM FAILURE MO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, DECISIONS WEIGHTS CO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, INT SERIES OPERATION
[4]  
ASCE, 2013, Report card for America's infrastructure
[5]   The cohesive frictional crack model applied to the analysis of the dam-foundation joint [J].
Barpi, F. ;
Valente, S. .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2010, 77 (11) :2182-2191
[6]   Structural assessment and reliability analysis for existing engineering structures, theoretical background [J].
Bergmeister, K. ;
Novak, D. ;
Pukl, R. ;
Cervenka, V. .
STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2009, 5 (04) :267-275
[7]  
Bowles D.S., 1997, P 3 INT C HYDR 97 TR
[8]   Nondestructive evaluation of concrete strength: An historical review and a new perspective by combining NDT methods [J].
Breysse, D. .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2012, 33 :139-163
[9]  
Degoutte G., 2002, FRENCH COMMITTEE LAR, P179
[10]   Vulnerability assessment and earthquake damage scenarios of the building stock of Potenza (Southern Italy) using Italian and Greek methodologies [J].
Dolce, M ;
Kappos, A ;
Masi, A ;
Penelis, G ;
Vona, M .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2006, 28 (03) :357-371