Hydrogen production from steam and dry reforming of methane-ethane-glycerol: A thermodynamic comparative analysis

Glycerol is produced as a by-product waste during the biodiesel manufacturing process. In recent researches, glycerol has been extensively studied for its potential to be converted into higher value-added compounds because it is renewable and bioavailable compound to reduce the high biodiesel production cost. As a result, various methods and technologies, such as steam reforming and dry reforming, were utilized to convert glycerol to higher value added products. The straightforward route of dry and steam reforming techniques uses carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases to create added-value products like syngas, which may be considered renewable alternatives to fossil fuels as global CO2 emission issues get higher and near-uncontrollable. Therefore, this article presents a novel thermodynamic equilibrium analysis of steam and dry reforming with methane-ethane-glycerol mixture based on the total Gibbs free energy minimization method for hydrogen generation. Equilibrium product compositions were determined as a function of molar ratio between H2O/methane-ethane-glycerol (WMEG) from 1:1 to 12:1 and CO2/methane-ethane-glycerol (CMEG) from 1:1 to 12:1 for steam and dry reforming respectively, where the molar basis of the methane-ethane-glycerol mixture is 1:1:1. The reforming temperatures are ranged from 573 K to 1273 K at atmospheric pressure of 1 bar. The production trends of H-2, CO, CO2, CH4 and C were compared between both reforming of glycerol. From to the result of the study, the optimal operating parameter for the highest hydrogen production was under steam reforming with WMEG of 3:1 at 1273 K and zero carbon deposition is achieved. In comparison with CO and CO2 production, dry reforming produced higher yields than steam reforming. Furthermore, a significant increment of hydrogen production was not observed at higher ratios of WMEG and CMEG. Steam reforming inhibited the carbon formation thermodynamically better than dry reforming.(c) 2022 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.