Which industries benefited from Trump environmental policy news? Evidence from industrial stock market reactions

被引:22
作者
Nerger, Gian-Luca [1 ]
Toan Luu Duc Huynh [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Mei [1 ]
机构
[1] WHU Otto Beisheim Sch Management, Chair Behav Finance, D-56179 Vallendar, Germany
[2] Univ Econ Ho Chi Minh City, Sch Banking, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] IPAG Business Sch, 184 Blvd St Germain, F-75006 Paris, France
关键词
Environmental news; Industrial stock market reactions; Event study; ANNOUNCEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101418
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate whether election of Donald Trump as the president of the United States of America (the US) and subsequent changes in environmental policies and regulations affected any of the 49 different industry sectors in the US. We analyze 19 different events during Trump's tenure that were mainly rollbacks of previously created regulations and policies. To analyze stock market effects, an event study methodology is used to assess industry reactions. We assume that Trump loosened environmental regulations and policies to strengthen the US economy. Results show that the lax enforcement of environmental regulations and policies was not effective. Only the coal industry can be considered a beneficiary because it experienced repetitive significant positive abnormal returns, whereas other industries experienced mixed or negative reactions or discontinuous positive reactions. Our results contribute to the extant literature on the US environmental policy within the scope of industry.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Social media posts and stock returns: The Trump factor [J].
Ajjoub, Carl ;
Walker, Thomas ;
Zhao, Yunfei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2021, 17 (02) :185-213
[2]  
Anderson-Weir C.H., 2010, Undergraduate Economic Review, V6, P9
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, MSCI US INDEX USD
[4]  
Ashwin Kumar N. C., 2016, J SUSTAIN FINANC INV, V6, P292, DOI [DOI 10.1080/20430795.2016.1234909, 10.1080/20430795.2016.1234909]
[5]   A year of rising dangerously? The US stock market performance in the aftermath of the presidential election [J].
Blanchard, Olivier ;
Collins, Christopher G. ;
Jahan-Parvar, Mohammad R. ;
Pellet, Thomas ;
Wilson, Beth Anne .
JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2018, 40 (03) :489-502
[6]   USING DAILY STOCK RETURNS - THE CASE OF EVENT STUDIES [J].
BROWN, SJ ;
WARNER, JB .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1985, 14 (01) :3-31
[7]   Political news and stock prices: evidence from Trump's trade war [J].
Burggraf, Tobias ;
Fendel, Ralf ;
Toan Luu Duc Huynh .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2020, 27 (18) :1485-1488
[8]  
Cevik N.K, 2020, IN PRESS
[9]   Surprise election for Trump connections [J].
Child, Travers Barclay ;
Massoud, Nadia ;
Schabus, Mario ;
Zhou, Yifan .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 140 (02) :676-697
[10]  
Conte Grand M, 2005, CEMA WORKING PAPERS