Development and internal validation of a nomogram to predict macrosomia

被引:24
作者
Mazouni, C.
Rouziert, R.
Ledu, R.
Heckenroth, H.
Guidicelli, B.
Gamerre, M.
机构
[1] Marseille Publ Hosp Syst, APHM, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, F-13385 Marseille 5, France
[2] Hop Tenon, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, F-75970 Paris, France
关键词
fetal weight; Hadlock; macrosomia; nomogram; ultrasound;
D O I
10.1002/uog.3999
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To develop a nomogram to predict macrosomia with a combination of clinical and ultrasound variables. Methods Data from 194 women who underwent sonographic fetal weight estimation were used to develop and calibrate a nomogram to predict fetal macrosomia. The nomogram was subjected to 200 bootstrap resamples for internal validation and to reduce overfit bias. An Internet-based tool was developed to facilitate use of the nomogram. Results The macrosomia prediction nomogram, based on parity, ethnicity, body mass index and fetal weight estimated macrosomia, had good discrimination and calibration before and after bootstrapping (area under curve (AUC), 0.860 and 0.850, respectively). The predictive accuracy of our nomogram was significantly better than was sonographically estimated fetal weight using Hadlock's formula (AUC, 0.740; P < 0.001). We have provided a web-based interface to predict the individual probability of macrosomia. Conclusion We have developed a nomogram to predict the individual probability of macrosomia based on clinical and ultrasound findings. Our web-based interface should help to guide patients and physicians in decision-making. Copyright (c) 2007 ISUOG. Published by John Wiles & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:544 / 549
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] THE PRECISION AND ACCURACY OF SYMPHYSIS - FUNDUS DISTANCE MEASUREMENTS DURING PREGNANCY
    BAGGER, PV
    ERIKSEN, PS
    SECHER, NJ
    THISTED, J
    WESTERGAARD, L
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1985, 64 (05) : 371 - 374
  • [2] Ben-Haroush A, 2004, J PERINAT MED, V32, P113
  • [3] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [4] BRADLEY E, 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP MONO
  • [5] Limitations of clinical sonographic estimates of birth weight: Experience with 1034 parturients
    Chauhan, SP
    Hendrix, NW
    Magann, EF
    Morrison, JC
    Kenney, SP
    Devoe, LD
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 91 (01) : 72 - 77
  • [6] Ultrasound estimation of fetal weight with the use of computerized artificial neural network model
    Chuang, L
    Hwang, JY
    Chang, CH
    Yu, CH
    Chang, FM
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 28 (08) : 991 - 996
  • [7] A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight
    Dudley, NJ
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 25 (01) : 80 - 89
  • [8] The influence of obesity and diabetes on the prevalence of macrosomia
    Ehrenberg, HM
    Mercer, BM
    Catalano, PM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (03) : 964 - 968
  • [9] THE USE OF A NEURAL NETWORK FOR THE ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT IN THE MACROSOMIC FETUS
    FARMER, RM
    MEDEARIS, AL
    HIRATA, GI
    PLATT, LD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 166 (05) : 1467 - 1472
  • [10] The effect of body mass index on three methods of fetal weight estimation
    Farrell, T
    Holmes, R
    Stone, P
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 109 (06) : 651 - 657