The application of a network approach to Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): introducing a new method for assessing HRQoL in healthy adults and cancer patients

被引:89
作者
Kossakowski, Jolanda J. [1 ]
Epskamp, Sacha [1 ]
Kieffer, Jacobien M. [2 ]
van Borkulo, Claudia D. [1 ,3 ]
Rhemtulla, Mijke [1 ]
Borsboom, Denny [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, Weesperpl 4, NL-1018 WZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Psychosocial Res & Epidemiol, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Interdisciplinary Ctr Psychopathol & Emot Regulat, Hanzepl 1, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Health-Related Quality of Life; Cancer; Network analysis; Psychometrics; Short Form Health Survey; SF-36; CAUSAL INDICATORS; SURVEY SF-36; 10; COUNTRIES; VALIDITY; MODEL; COMORBIDITY; VALIDATION; VERSION;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-015-1127-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) research has typically adopted either a formative approach, in which HRQoL is the common effect of its observables, or a reflective approach-defining HRQoL as a latent variable that determines observable characteristics of HRQoL. Both approaches, however, do not take into account the complex organization of these characteristics. The objective of this study was to introduce a new approach for analyzing HRQoL data, namely a network model (NM). An NM, as opposed to traditional research strategies, accounts for interactions among observables and offers a complementary analytic approach. We applied the NM to samples of Dutch cancer patients (N = 485) and Dutch healthy adults (N = 1742) who completed the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Networks were constructed for both samples separately and for a combined sample with diagnostic status added as an extra variable. We assessed the network structures and compared the structures of the two separate samples on the item and domain levels. The relative importance of individual items in the network structures was determined using centrality analyses. We found that the global structure of the SF-36 is dominant in all networks, supporting the validity of questionnaire's subscales. Furthermore, results suggest that the network structure of both samples was highly similar. Centrality analyses revealed that maintaining a daily routine despite one's physical health predicts HRQoL levels best. We concluded that the NM provides a fruitful alternative to classical approaches used in the psychometric analysis of HRQoL data.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 792
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations [J].
Aaronson, NK ;
Muller, M ;
Cohen, PDA ;
Essink-Bot, ML ;
Fekkes, M ;
Sanderman, R ;
Sprangers, MAG ;
Velde, AT ;
Verrips, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :1055-1068
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Probability and Mathematical Statistics
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, STAT COMP 2 NETWORKS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, NETWORKS INTRO
[5]   The architecture of complex weighted networks [J].
Barrat, A ;
Barthélemy, M ;
Pastor-Satorras, R ;
Vespignani, A .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (11) :3747-3752
[6]   CONVENTIONAL WISDOM ON MEASUREMENT - A STRUCTURAL EQUATION PERSPECTIVE [J].
BOLLEN, K ;
LENNOX, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (02) :305-314
[7]  
Borsboom D., 2005, Measuring the mind: Conceptual issues in contemporary psychometrics
[8]   Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems [J].
Borsboom, Denny .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 64 (09) :1089-1108
[9]   Truth and Evidence in Validity Theory [J].
Borsboom, Denny ;
Markus, Keith A. .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2013, 50 (01) :110-114
[10]   VALIDATING THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE - NEW OUTCOME MEASURE FOR PRIMARY CARE [J].
BRAZIER, JE ;
HARPER, R ;
JONES, NMB ;
OCATHAIN, A ;
THOMAS, KJ ;
USHERWOOD, T ;
WESTLAKE, L .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6846) :160-164