The Impact of Sleep-Related Attentional Bias on Polysomnographically Measured Sleep in Primary Insomnia

被引:38
作者
Spiegelhalder, Kai [1 ]
Kyle, Simon D. [2 ]
Feige, Bernd [1 ]
Prem, Martin [1 ]
Nissen, Christoph [1 ]
Espie, Colin A. [2 ]
Riemann, Dieter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Glasgow, Sleep Ctr, Dept Psychol Med, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Primary insomnia; attentional bias; emotional Stroop task; visual dot probe task; polysomnography; EMOTIONAL STROOP INTERFERENCE; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL INSOMNIA; COGNITIVE MODEL; PHASE SYNDROME; ANXIETY; THREAT; EPIDEMIOLOGY; STIMULI; TASK;
D O I
10.1093/sleep/33.1.107
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Objectives: Although sleep-related attentional bias has been shown to be evident in primary insomnia, the association with objectively measured sleep has not been investigated. In the present study, we used polysomnography (PSG) to fill this void. Design: Patients with primary insomnia and healthy controls were studied using a visual dot probe task (VDP) and an emotional Stroop task (EST). Additionally, polysomnography was carried out in a sub-sample (n = 22) of patients in the subsequent night. Setting: Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy of the University of Freiburg Medical Center. Participants: Thirty patients with primary insomnia and 30 matched healthy controls. Interventions: N/A Measurements and Results: Patients with primary insomnia demonstrated a significant sleep-related attentional bias compared to controls in the EST but no significant group effects were found for the VDP. VDP attentional bias scores were positively correlated with measures of sleep pressure, including total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and the amount of slow wave sleep. EST attentional bias scores were not correlated with subsequent PSG parameters, and we did not observe a correlation between attentional bias scores on the two tasks. Conclusions: The unexpected relationship between increased attentional bias, in the VDP task, and improved markers of sleep duration and continuity, may be indicative of a homeostatic craving for sleep in those with high attentional bias. This awaits further testing in multiple night studies, to shed light on the mechanisms and implications of sleep-related attentional bias.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 112
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[2]   Hypervigilance and attentional fixedness in chronic musculoskeletal pain: Consistency of findings across modified Stroop and dot-probe tasks [J].
Asmundson, GJG ;
Wright, KD ;
Hadjistavropoulos, HD .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2005, 6 (08) :497-506
[3]  
BONNET MH, 1992, SLEEP, V15, P526
[4]   24-HOUR METABOLIC-RATE IN INSOMNIACS AND MATCHED NORMAL SLEEPERS [J].
BONNET, MH ;
ARAND, DL .
SLEEP, 1995, 18 (07) :581-588
[5]   Attentional bias for threatening facial expressions in anxiety: Manipulation of stimulus duration [J].
Bradley, BP ;
Mogg, K ;
Falla, SJ ;
Hamilton, LR .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 1998, 12 (06) :737-753
[6]   Processing bias in anxious subjects and repressors, measured by emotional Stroop interference and attentional allocation [J].
Brosschot, JF ;
de Ruiter, C ;
Kindt, M .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1999, 26 (05) :777-793
[7]   THE PITTSBURGH SLEEP QUALITY INDEX - A NEW INSTRUMENT FOR PSYCHIATRIC PRACTICE AND RESEARCH [J].
BUYSSE, DJ ;
REYNOLDS, CF ;
MONK, TH ;
BERMAN, SR ;
KUPFER, DJ .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 1989, 28 (02) :193-213
[8]   THE EMOTIONAL STROOP INTERFERENCE EFFECT IN ANXIETY - ATTENTIONAL BIAS OR COGNITIVE AVOIDANCE [J].
DERUITER, C ;
BROSSCHOT, JF .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1994, 32 (03) :315-319
[9]   The priming effect of alcohol pre-load on attentional bias to alcohol-related stimuli [J].
Duka, T ;
Townshend, JM .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 176 (3-4) :353-U6
[10]   Assessing attention allocation toward threat-related stimuli: a comparison of the emotional Stroop task and the attentional probe task [J].
Egloff, B ;
Hock, M .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2003, 35 (02) :475-483