Staging functional damage in glaucoma: Review of different classification methods

被引:130
作者
Brusini, Paolo
Johnson, Chris A.
机构
[1] Santa Maria Misericordia Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[2] Devers Eye Inst, Discoveries Sight Labs, Portland, OR USA
关键词
chronic open-angle glaucoma; functional loss classification; perimetry; staging methods; standard automated perimetry; visual field defect; visual field loss; characteristics; VISUAL-FIELD LOSS; CORRECTED LOSS VARIANCE; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; DIFFUSE LOSS; DEEP SCLERECTOMY; MEAN DEFECT; LONG-TERM; PROGRESSION; PERIMETRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.survophthal.2006.12.008
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Classification of glaucomatous visual field defects for different severity levels is important. The reasons for this are numerous, and include: to distinguish between healthy and diseased individuals, to have homogeneous grouping criteria when perimetry is used to define the severity of glaucoma, to adjust therapy on the basis of disease severity, to describe visual field conditions in a short and simple format, to monitor the progression of the disease, and to provide a common language for both clinical and research purposes. Many severity classification methods have been proposed, although none have had widespread use in clinical practice. Other methods, like the cumulative defect curve (Bebie curve), can be used to distinguish the type of visual field loss as diffuse, localized, or mixed. This article provides a review of the main classification methods that have been proposed in the past 40 years.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 179
页数:24
相关论文
共 93 条
[21]   Enhanced Glaucoma Staging System (GSS 2) for classifying functional damage in glaucoma [J].
Brusini, P ;
Filacorda, S .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2006, 15 (01) :40-46
[22]  
Brusini P, 1996, Eur J Ophthalmol, V6, P402
[23]   Frequency Doubling technology staging system 2 [J].
Brusini, Paolo .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2006, 15 (04) :315-320
[24]  
BUSINI P, 1997, PERIMETRY UPDATE 199, P329
[25]  
CHOPLIN NT, 1995, VISUAL FIELD TESTING, P156
[26]  
COLENBRANDER A, 1993, PERIMETRY UPDATE 1992/1993, P487
[27]  
CORALLO G, 1995, PERIMETRY UPDATE 1994/1995, P283
[28]  
DRANCE SM, 1991, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V98, P1533
[29]   SAMPLING SYSTEMS FOR VISUAL-FIELD ASSESSMENT AND COMPUTERIZED PERIMETRY [J].
DRASDO, N ;
PEASTON, WC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1980, 64 (09) :705-712
[30]   GRID FOR SCORING VISUAL FIELDS .2. PERIMETER [J].
ESTERMAN, B .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1968, 79 (04) :400-&